Far far too many for sure. No honestly I know a few farmers I very much respect, but they’re getting older and the fail sons that are inherently the fields suck (the ones that don’t aren’t fail sons by definition)

Hey won’t be gullitined and instead he will just face prison time and have his mass survelence system dismantled and the rest of his assets seized and redistributed

A fair and just compromise imho

Water for food is a compromisable subject. Child pron factories aren’t for far more people.

At least for me, pro farmer folk do understand conservation and the important of managing natural resources, again it’s a compromise when it comes to feeding people (yes, we also have to fight against wasteful water practices and choose to grow more sustainable food, but that should not stop momentum where we got it).

Yep. At the current rate neither the Chinese nor American states will save us. Neither want democracy or liberty for the average person and value control over any other moral principle.

I’m sure the elites in China won’t take your money because they have gambling, sports cars, and hookers at home /s

I’ll be honest I also assumed direct action instead of awareness campaign

I mean listen, awareness campaign and getting local officials out either commiting to being against or outing themselves as defenders of this stuff (just before many elections) is useful, it’s just harder to call it “action” lol

Tbf most US nationalization schemes are just bailouts. The car manufactures just had stocks purchased. Intel too.

There is little appetite from corpo Dems and of course any Republicans for a forced seizing of assets.

Honestly. GitHub has been playing catch-up to Gitlab’s features for like decade to me. I still prefer their ci runner model to this day.

“Do parents have no control over their kids?”

Almost never had. Control is an illusion.

In the current state of the world it’s an honor to be considered

Sometimes I say words like they are typed, which is wrong. Sometimes I type words like they are spoken, also wrong.

😂

To be honest my first thought when reading this is how it would also apply to X for the same reasons

Its both a real thing with some promise and also bullshit to act like it’s anyware near killing spots where current AI excelerates.

It’s not from my understanding he was using AI for semantic search to find paper to research

I know people that assume apple can’t access their cloud data without them. This breaks that assumption. Meaning any cloud can be used and given to anyone at Apples discretion.

From the area, maybe, but that doesn’t cover all opinions or diasporia that could be in an area.

Speaking Arabic could mean about a third of world in land coverage or diaspora found all over the world. Its a poor catagorization. I mean not nearly as brain dead as phenotype like racists do, but still poor short hand for much.

Not really. The most accurate thing would simply to identify the people who are saying such things as a group. Creating arbitrary correlation with some shared aspects is well arbitrary at best, or worse just a dog whistle.

They fact that he fell for the marketing isn’t negated by him also explaining other parts of AI. That’s kind of non-sequitor

No no I want this one guy to be ahistorically flawless please. That is more important than any major issue like fascist revival movements and/or the climate crisis /s

Thank you! Though it doesn’t seem the judge imposed any requirement to destroy the physical copies just that creating a large digital library from the copies for reuse would violate the IP rights of the work owners