• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    444 days ago

    Meanwhile, Reddit’s chief legal officer, Ben Lee, wrote that the company intends to “ensure that the researchers are held accountable for their misdeeds.”

    “How dare they perform such dangerous and unethical experiments on our users without paying us an appropriate access fee?” He probably went on to say.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    234 days ago

    …and the researchers considered thier experiment a success because they didn’t see any comments calling thier bots, bots…it shouldn’t matter that calling someone a bot is a bannable offense there…

  • flatlined
    link
    fedilink
    124 days ago

    So, we’re gonna tackle bot manipulation for research purposes at the same time we’re gonna deal with bot manipulation for ads and political manipulation, right? Or is it just not okay to do for scientific ends but fine if it’s to sell you shit or advance a political agenda?

    To be clear, this is very much not okay, it’s just weird to me that once the goal is to sell you shit people are much more accepting of it as business as usual.

    • defunct_punk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      134 days ago

      I’m surprised there were any human users left on CMV to be offended by this

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        54 days ago

        Bots are capable of simulating offense perfectly well.

  • Ogmios
    link
    fedilink
    54 days ago

    If only everyone who tried to warn about this sort of shit happening wasn’t an alt-right troll, maybe something could have been done!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    04 days ago

    But the lesson you’re taking from it is that they are still not worth it, rather than maybe it’s important to listen to people you don’t agree with on everything, because people are complex?