mostly shit already. ymmv

  • Alphane Moon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4220 days ago

    Google disagrees. In fact, the company tells the BBC that AI Overviews have been good for the web, and AI Mode will be no different. Google insists these features send users to “a greater diversity of websites” and the traffic is “higher quality” because people spend more time on the links they click.

    However, the company hasn’t provided data to back up these claims.

    This is how we know they are lying.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1719 days ago

      Google disagrees. In fact, the company tells the BBC “Trust us, bro.”

      Non-AI summary.

      • Chaotic Entropy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        119 days ago

        I could spend a lot of time sifting through ads, nag screens and bullshit to find the actual detail I want on a webpage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          117 days ago

          Or validating source, making sure it isn’t AI content which usually regurgitates the same talking points. Homogenizing the entire query and removing actual information variance of personal experience.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      619 days ago

      Damn, thats fuckin’ metal, bro. Also, the text to gif gave me a flashback of ~15 years ago.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        619 days ago

        feels like its 1998 and I’m listening to MTV while browsing the web on AOL with that gif, lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2920 days ago

    I haven’t used Google Search in quite a while. It’s frankly unusable for finding any useful information for someone like me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1520 days ago

        Yahoo games and clubs, groups and search, chat and messenger that had filesharing and video and allowed cross fertilisation between everything. It was becoming the internet, it was set to buy Google and then it just stopped and closed it all down.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2619 days ago

    We’re soon going to end up back in the early/mid 90s where the only way to find something is via a internet yellowpages… only this time, not because search engines dont exist yet, but because they are completely worthless garbage.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2119 days ago

    Unpopular opinion: The missing business model for websites is killing the web. If there was a platform that would distribute a monthly fee to the websites we visit, the web would be much better.

    50% could be allocated through traffic, 50% by choice. I could pay 20€ a month for example. Some would go to lemmy, some to my local newspaper, some to my favorite YouTube channels, authors or bloggers.

    If enough people did this, investigative journalism would be funded, product testers wouldn’t be reliant on sponsoring and hobbyists could gain serious funding without selling out.

    • Chaotic Entropy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      819 days ago

      Sounds like you want to nationalise the internet and all its services. :P

      If only we could pay for a worthwhile internet via taxes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 days ago

        All it would take would be a platform that handles the payment and supplies a tracking pixel. Websites could join and become part of it. At the moment, every single publisher has their own payment solution. If I want to read one local article from Houston today and one from Tokyo tomorrow, I won’t join two payment plans. I want them to be paid automatically, like when I play a song on Spotify or watch a video on YouTube. Just a decent amount of money instead of paying mostly middlemen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      219 days ago

      I would love a if there was a standard websites would use to receive donations. An integrated browser addon that track what you visit and gives you a review before distributing funds after each month would be great. It should accumulate money to avoid transaction fees for tiny amounts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1420 days ago

    Google search engine has been shit for a decade or more. Wasn’t there some document that it was made so by purpose, because there was no incentive to improve it becuse there was no real competition or the competition was just a front-end to google.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1220 days ago

      2018-2019 is when they officially turned the corner and decided to focus only on ad revenue. But the SEO abuse dove it into the ground by 2014ish. They were making money enough to expand by orders of magnitude into other areas, so they simply didn’t want to tweak their search or strategy and kill their golden goose that funded things like Good Drive and their shit social network and loon, etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 days ago

        histrionic

        True… yet nearly everybody else, maybe beside few like 404 media, seems to be either boot licking or access “journalism” so I get the “spicy” take.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1119 days ago

    I recommend Kagi. It is a search engine with absolutely no tracking or ads, AI slop filter, an in-house index and a cute doggo. It’s a paid search engine (which means you pay with money not with data), but you can give it a try with 300 free searches with no strings attached.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1320 days ago

    Blaming google is like blaming the gun for killing someone, google gonna do what google gonna do, it’s up to the consumer to effect change through attention.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1520 days ago

      Well no, it’s not, because they have multiple monopolies. So we should blame them and blame government for not stopping them.

    • Cyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      No, it’s Google changing their algorithm to feed you AI slop.

      The first page and a half of Google results now is just AI-generated comparison websites. That’s by design.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      420 days ago

      To a degree perhaps. It has also monopolised industries that feed into each other. Even if you choose not to use their consumer products, you are being used by them as the product in these industries if you use the web at all, which is most of their business model. That isn’t consumer choice. Political intervention is one hope, which in some countries I guess there is some consumer power over, if consumers were to collectivise to a degree more valuable than the lobbying power of this monster. The internet was turned into the yellowpages with sharp teeth by google .

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -520 days ago

        Oh yes, political intervention, that’ll work, no chance of that turning out worse than what we have now.

        How about taking responsibility and just not using services that require it. And I dont care if that’s a disadvantage to some, that’s the cost.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          420 days ago

          Political intervention is what started Google, so I don’t see the problem.

          How about taking responsibility and just not using services that require it.

          Google has shaped the web into what it is over decades so that they could maintain their position of power. This is the very essence and purpose of a monopoly. Yet here you are trying to blame anything but the monopoly for the monopoly’s existence.

          Nothing like convincing hundreds of millions of people to abandon a company rather than put any pressure on the small group of greedy people who own it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          319 days ago

          The two approaches you mention need not be mutually exclusive. I ditched google services more than 10 years ago, while loving somewhere they did some truly despicable antidemocratic things. but so what? They’re a corporation. There are political lobby groups, privacy foundations and advocacy groups you can contribute to. Despite being respectfully evangelical with those around me, most other than a fringe really don’t care enough about this. Doesn’t mean I’ll stop. I will still suggest alternatives. They’re my principles. you’re working in their interest if you tell your allies to give up. I understand and share the cynicism around political process especially in democratic nations with disappointing levels of corporate influence over legislation, we can only engage in it best we can, as well as exerting our rights as consumers. The critical mass required may seem insurmountable but negativity toward those effectively on your side is not going to help either.