

sorry I guess I’m not following. Can you give an example of how using your tool to run scripts would be different than running them manually? It be great if you can show what a command line session would actually look like.
Free Software Enthusiast


sorry I guess I’m not following. Can you give an example of how using your tool to run scripts would be different than running them manually? It be great if you can show what a command line session would actually look like.


I don’t know what you mean by CLI runner. What would it do?


I looked at your code and I can’t see anything that this does that I can’t already do with standard shell utils. Looks like a nice project for your learning but not something anyone else should use.
Filezilla also does SFTP
How does ot compare to Filezilla?


What a roller coaster!
Going to migrate to infrastructure as code for my documentation
This is the way to do it. Using basic config management and never handjamming anything. I use the git commit log to make notes. That way, later I can check when a file was added or changed and see the explanation for it.


The Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide and Classic Shell Scripting[PDF] are both great IMO.


No Fast Format is needed on a modern linux system with a modern filesystem. Outside of very specific tuned workloads, it won’t make any noticable difference as linux already is detecting and optimizing for the 4k physical sectors.


I wouldn’t be surprised if they were in on it. OpenAI wants us to think they have invented powerful beings that can do things like “escape containment” when its all BS.


Ah, in that case I’d try OBS. You can capture and “share” half your screen with OBS if your meeting software works with the OBS camera output. You add your camera as a source in OBS if you also want to be on the screen while sharing.


I always share a tab or window because then screen ratio becomes irrelevant, or am I missing something special about your setup?


Cool, thanks for sharing


As you are promoting it as something new I was hoping you would tell me about the unique aspects, advantages, or differences from existing options.


OP why would we want this, compared to all the other versions of BASIC with labels?
I need to setup a NetBSD workstation running this


Help me understand, how does it work well (or better than either pure bash or pure python)? From what I know, calling python multiple times in a shell script is very inefficient vs running a single full python script.
Also, for maintainability I try to avoid in-lining another language in a shell script as it is almost always more confusing code because of escapes. What am I missing that makes this way better?


Interesting approach to use a shell script with multiple in-line python calls inside shell functions. What is the intent behind this design vs doing it fully in python?


Personally, I don’t think its needed. You can look at the screen for immediate feedback of what you typed and there are typing practice games which certainly help with good practice.
I haven’t personally used it but I think that is what pam_time is for.