@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoIs anyone using PixelFed? How is your experience so far?message-square48fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down10
arrow-up1121arrow-down1message-squareIs anyone using PixelFed? How is your experience so far?@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-squareMeldriklinkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoThis is a setting by the admin of that Pixelfed instance. Try another instance, if you are unhappy with the quality.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoSince storage costs money, does it allow the admin to offer tiered access to higher quality storage?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoWell damn. I already copied my entire Instagram library there so I guess I’ll just deal with it.
minus-squareMeldriklinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoAlso consider that Instagram uses aggressive image compression and then you import from that to Pixelfed, which also does its own compression. No wonder the quality is questionable. Have you tried adding an original image to Pixelfed?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoNo I mean the new pictures I’ve uploaded there since too.
This is a setting by the admin of that Pixelfed instance. Try another instance, if you are unhappy with the quality.
Since storage costs money, does it allow the admin to offer tiered access to higher quality storage?
Not natively in Pixelfed.
Well damn. I already copied my entire Instagram library there so I guess I’ll just deal with it.
Also consider that Instagram uses aggressive image compression and then you import from that to Pixelfed, which also does its own compression. No wonder the quality is questionable.
Have you tried adding an original image to Pixelfed?
No I mean the new pictures I’ve uploaded there since too.