@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoA strong hunchi.imgur.comimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1779arrow-down120
arrow-up1759arrow-down1imageA strong hunchi.imgur.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareDessertStormslinkfedilink-8•1 year ago The ‘victim card’ is the conservative ‘race card’. Except only one of those is real, while the other is made up by those trying to use the first…
minus-squareladlinkfedilink2•1 year agoThey may have meant that “race card” is real and “victim cars” is not. But I still don’t think that is a valid point
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoPossibly so. When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned. Relative references in language is confusing!
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoTechnically, for referencing the previous parts there are “former” and “latter”, but you never know if it was not used intentionally or not.
Except only one of those is real, while the other is made up by those trying to use the first…
Boop beep I got delete.
They may have meant that “race card” is real and “victim cars” is not. But I still don’t think that is a valid point
Possibly so.
When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned.
Relative references in language is confusing!
Technically, for referencing the previous parts there are “former” and “latter”, but you never know if it was not used intentionally or not.