• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Headline is dumb. If capacitors are better at being batteries than batteries are, they just become the next generation of batteries.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      831 year ago

      But capacitors aren’t batteries. Batteries store chemical energy. Capacitors store electrical potential energy. Electronically they behave much differently.

      • Em Adespoton
        link
        fedilink
        271 year ago

        Yes they do… including not holding a charge when the differential drops too far.

        The real wins are in battery-backed capacitors. Charge the caps fast, then let them keep the batteries topped up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 year ago

          That’s what I do being off-grid. I have my battery bank then a series of Supercaps to essentially act as an on/off ramp//drawbridge and temper quick demands. Kinda like an inverse soft starter so this is suuuuper interesting to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Only for certain types of capacitors. In practice they can overlap quite a bit, especially with common aluminium electrolytic capacitors (these form & dissolve complex aluminium oxide & hydroxide layers on the plates).

    • davel [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Headline is not dumb. There are reasons to make a distinction between the two, the most salient one being that capacitors are several orders of magnitude faster to charge and discharge.

    • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Capacitors can theoretically charge MUCH faster.

      However the galvanic potential of lithium is as large as is practically possible. The galvanic potential is what really matters for a battery. Capacitors are nowhere near the joules per weight/volume.