• Laurel Raven
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            But why bring it up at all? Nobody said anything about R so why make that comparison?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  You didn’t seem to understand my question

                  Dismissing all but Rust is a joke

                  Saying Go is better than R at things R isn’t used for is a joke because it’s obvious and someone doing this in R would just draw the question of why even though they could

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Not sure where you got the 25kb number from.

        This tool is written in go and is a 7.8 MB compiled binary.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            Because it’s a statically compiled binary, it tends to grow the size of the binary. Increases portability though.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Did you mean 1MB? With correct settings, you get under 1MB Rust binaries and with even more compression using upx it gets to 300KB, probably less for much simpler applications. Rust applications aren’t that big of a deal as people make it to be; within reasons off course.

        • lemmyvore
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          The one issue I have with Rust apps is how much memory they need to compile (depending on the app ofc). I could not install Pika Backup from AUR on a laptop with 4 GB of RAM for instance because the compilation would run out of memory. It’s one case where I was glad flatpak is an option.