Lemmy@Moonling.nl
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@dvdnet62@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months ago

Girl, 15, speaks out after classmate made deepfake nudes of her and posted online

www.independent.co.uk

external-link
message-square
115
fedilink
273
external-link

Girl, 15, speaks out after classmate made deepfake nudes of her and posted online

www.independent.co.uk

@dvdnet62@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months ago
message-square
115
fedilink
Teenager Elliston Berry is calling on lawmakers to require that tech companies remove AI-generated pornography within two days of a report
  • @todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    4•
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Removed by mod

    • @HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8•
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m not sure where you’re going with that? I would argue that yes, it is. As it’s sexual material of a child, with that child’s face on it, explicitly made for the purpose of defaming her. So I would say it sexually abused a child.

      But you could also be taking the stance of “AI trains on adult porn, and is mearly recreating child porn. No child was actually harmed during the process.” Which as I’ve said above, I disagree with, especially in this particular circumstance.

      Apologies if it’s just my reading comprehension being shit

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2•11 months ago

      it would be material of and or containing child sexual abuse in it.

    • @fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      1•11 months ago

      Is that the definition of CSAM?

    • @delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      -13•
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Is it material that may encourage people to sexually abuse a child?

      • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11•
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s actually not clear that viewing material leads that person to causing in person abuse

        Providing non harmful ways to access the content may lead to less abuse as the content they seek no longer comes from abuse, reducing demand for abusive content.

        That being said, this instance isn’t completely fabricated and given its further release is harmful as it it involves a real person and will have emotional impact.

        • @delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          1•11 months ago

          There’s other instances where it was completely fabricated, and the courts ruled it was CSAM and convicted

          • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            6•
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            There has been yes, but it doesn’t mean it’s the right ruling law. The law varies on that by jurisdiction as well because it is a murky area.

            Edit: in the USA it might not even be illegal unless there was intent to distribute

            By the statute’s own terms, the law does not make all fictional child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. The mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the Internet, transported across state lines, or of an amount that showed intent to distribute.[

            So local AI generating fictional material that is not distributed may be okay federally in the USA.

            • @delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              2•11 months ago

              Serious value? How does one legally argue that their AI-generated child porn stash has “serious value” so they they don’t get incarcerated.

              Laws are weird.

              • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                3•
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Have the AI try to recreate existing CP already deemed to have serious value and then have all the prompts/variations leading up to the closest match as part of an exhibit.

                Edit: I should add, don’t try this at home, they’ll still probably say it has no value and throw you in jail.

                • @delirious_owl@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3•11 months ago

                  Prison*

                  • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2•11 months ago

                    Ah my bad, you’re right.

                    Then you’ll probably get shanked if any of the other inmates find out you were sent there for CP.

            • @progandy@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              1•11 months ago

              deleted by creator

      • @todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        0•
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Removed by mod

        • @MehBlah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1•11 months ago

          Any sex act involving a adult and a child/minor is abusive by its very nature.

    • @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -15•
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Removed by mod

      • @todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1•
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Removed by mod

        • @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          -10•
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Removed by mod

          • @todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            8•
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Removed by mod

            • @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              -10•
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Removed by mod

              • @magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                5•11 months ago

                Removed by mod

                • @todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  6•
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Removed by mod

                  • @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
                    shield
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -5•
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Removed by mod

                • @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -8•
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Removed by mod

                  • @todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    3•
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    Removed by mod

          • @magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            1•11 months ago

            Removed by mod

            • Zoot
              link
              fedilink
              3•11 months ago

              Removed by mod

          • @refalo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            1•11 months ago

            attack the argument, not the person

            • @Surreal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              1•11 months ago

              Practice what you preach. Read the thread again, what do you think “say something about you” mean?

            • @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              -1•
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Removed by mod

              • Zoot
                link
                fedilink
                1•11 months ago

                Then don’t defend them? You’re trying to tell everyone that what is literally above in an article, about a child who had PHOTOREALISTIC pictures made of her, that it isn’t CSAM.

                It is. Deleting everyone’s comments who disagree with you will not change that, and if anything, WILL make you seem even more like the bad guy.

Technology@lemmy.ml

!technology@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.ml

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

  • 543 users / day
  • 1.36K users / week
  • 2.81K users / month
  • 7.6K users / 6 months
  • 38K subscribers
  • 2.49K Posts
  • 25.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org