@[email protected] to [email protected] • 11 months agoQueen's Gambitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1653arrow-down153
arrow-up1600arrow-down1imageQueen's Gambitlemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•edit-211 months agoAre you sure you’re not thinking of Margaret Thatcher? I mean ones an old white fascist lady and the other… wait-
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•11 months agoWell Thatcher’s family didn’t profit off slavery and colonialism. At least directly…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•11 months agoIn any case it’s Neo-Liberals, all the way down. *shudders
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•11 months agoSo, you’re in favour after Thatcher then? Because you make it sound like a direct competition.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•11 months agoI mean it’s a competition like finding which turd has the most worms in it. Either way you’re studying a piece of shit
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•11 months agoOr you really like studying worms. But that would be whataboutism wouldn’t it?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•11 months agoOk I have no clue what you’re arguing for or against.
Are you sure you’re not thinking of Margaret Thatcher? I mean ones an old white fascist lady and the other… wait-
Well Thatcher’s family didn’t profit off slavery and colonialism. At least directly…
In any case it’s Neo-Liberals, all the way down. *shudders
So, you’re in favour after Thatcher then? Because you make it sound like a direct competition.
I mean it’s a competition like finding which turd has the most worms in it. Either way you’re studying a piece of shit
Or you really like studying worms. But that would be whataboutism wouldn’t it?
Ok I have no clue what you’re arguing for or against.
He just awkwardly trying to bait you into conflict