@[email protected] to [email protected] • 11 months agoviolently cries and sobslemmy.mlimagemessage-square242fedilinkarrow-up1578arrow-down1105
arrow-up1473arrow-down1imageviolently cries and sobslemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square242fedilink
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoethnically would be some flavor of european, slav, asian, or south african/american and to some degree, american (considering the natives as american) like i said, that’s a demonym.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•11 months agoyou’re wrong and condescending: not a good combination.
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months agodoesn’t take much googling to find out im not wrong. As for being condescending, i think i would just argue that i’m correct.
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months agowell, i mean your genetics would know. I’m not sure you would, unless you can read your own DNA.
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months agoand dogs aren’t genetics, neither are nuclear reactors, or vacuums.
ethnically I am a Pennsylvanian…wtf…
ethnically would be some flavor of european, slav, asian, or south african/american and to some degree, american (considering the natives as american)
like i said, that’s a demonym.
you’re wrong and condescending: not a good combination.
doesn’t take much googling to find out im not wrong. As for being condescending, i think i would just argue that i’m correct.
it’s my ethnicity. I would know
well, i mean your genetics would know. I’m not sure you would, unless you can read your own DNA.
ethnicity isn’t genetics
and dogs aren’t genetics, neither are nuclear reactors, or vacuums.
this is a nonsequitur.