banner80 to [email protected] • 11 months agoNever tire of winningfedia.ioimagemessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up11.54Karrow-down153
arrow-up11.48Karrow-down1imageNever tire of winningfedia.iobanner80 to [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square122fedilink
minus-squareKⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24linkfedilink4•11 months agoyou didn’t need to but you did choose to preface this with “technically” which should have tipped you off that this really isn’t in the same arena.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•11 months agoNo, but it is an excuse to share this article about that law. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html This really means that Harlow v Fitzgerald should be overturned.
you didn’t need to but you did choose to preface this with “technically” which should have tipped you off that this really isn’t in the same arena.
No, but it is an excuse to share this article about that law.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html
This really means that Harlow v Fitzgerald should be overturned.