Todd’s urgent dismissal of the documentary reads to Hoback like an attempt to throw Satoshi-hunters off the scent. “It doesn’t surprise me at all that Peter would go on the offense. He’s a master of game theory—it’s what he does. He has spent a lot of years now muddying the waters,” says Hoback. “He’s an unbelievable genius.”

I haven’t seen the docu, but I did like his (Hoback’s) docu about Qanon, Q: Into the Storm.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    757 months ago

    Unless somebody can “predict” (e.g. announce before executing) movement of coins from verified Satoshi wallets, I won’t believe any of these unmaskings.

    I would love to know who Satoshi is, but that level of proof would require a willing Satoshi and they (singular or plural) appear to not be up for that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      267 months ago

      There is an easier way, just sign something with Satoshi’s private key and no one will have a doubt that you are Satoshi. No need for all this ridiculous drama.

      • Kairos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        Technically that’s the same thing. Both are signatures with a private key.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          Agreed, except that moving coins costs money while signing something with the private key doesn’t.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Both actions would cost billions more than any amount they would move or a signed transaction.

            The price would crash knowing those coins were back in play.

            It’d be a huge influx of potential coins considered to be lost.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              That’s not accurate. Any serious investor would assume the coins still exist and could be moved. Selling the coins would roil the markets but that’s no different than if someone with a majority stake in a stock (eg DJT) were to dump their shares.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                Any serious investor would be estimating how many other people are not serious investors, and understand that those unserious people would swing the price.

                There’s no value to bitcoin except people’s expectations.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  You’re not wrong but in general prices are moved by market makers who are trading large quantities. I can imagine assuming that the guy who invented bitcoin and went to such lengths to conceal his identity would not have access to his coins.