@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agoBut "socialism" is a scary wordslrpnk.netimagemessage-square277fedilinkarrow-up11.52Karrow-down145
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1imageBut "socialism" is a scary wordslrpnk.net@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square277fedilink
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink3•4 months agoYes, technically there is a top and a bottom, like an upper level administrator and a lower level worker, but this is not a relationship of exploitation just like it isn’t your manager that exploits you under Capitalism, but the Business Owner(s).
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink3•4 months agoCorrect. I am a Communist, I am just offering technical clarification that hierarchy exists under Communism, but not exploitation.
Yes, technically there is a top and a bottom, like an upper level administrator and a lower level worker, but this is not a relationship of exploitation just like it isn’t your manager that exploits you under Capitalism, but the Business Owner(s).
under communism, there is no exploitation
Correct. I am a Communist, I am just offering technical clarification that hierarchy exists under Communism, but not exploitation.