@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months agoGoogle encourages "protecting your business against costly state regulations"infosec.pubimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1257arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1248arrow-down1imageGoogle encourages "protecting your business against costly state regulations"infosec.pub@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•5 months agoProtect your business against protecting people. withgoogle.com They are ashamed to put that fucking shit on their own domain name.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•5 months agoNot to defend Google, but it has nothing to do with shame and everything to do with marketing. If you read the URL as a sentence supportsmallbiz.withgoogle.com = Support Small Biz With Google
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•5 months agoThey could have done smallbizzwith.google.com but are hiding it and they will pretend that it doesn’t exist once they shut down the site. We’ve seen this already a few time at various companies.
minus-squareChozolinkfedilink4•5 months agoHow is that any more hidden? Unless you already know the subdomain in the first place, the domain doesn’t really make much difference.
Protect your business against protecting people.
They are ashamed to put that fucking shit on their own domain name.
Not to defend Google, but it has nothing to do with shame and everything to do with marketing.
If you read the URL as a sentence supportsmallbiz.withgoogle.com = Support Small Biz With Google
They could have done smallbizzwith.google.com but are hiding it and they will pretend that it doesn’t exist once they shut down the site. We’ve seen this already a few time at various companies.
How is that any more hidden? Unless you already know the subdomain in the first place, the domain doesn’t really make much difference.
A bit more plausible deniability