☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to [email protected]English • 4 months ago"leftists"lemmy.mlimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down149
arrow-up139arrow-down1image"leftists"lemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squaredavel [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish6•4 months ago The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, insists that only the more modest position is being advanced. Upon retreating to the motte, the arguer may claim that the bailey has not been refuted (because the critic refused to attack the motte) or that the critic is unreasonable (by equating an attack on the bailey with an attack on the motte).
Real. This thread is making my brain hurt