@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months agoRednote right nowlemmy.mlimagemessage-square693fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down1258file-text
arrow-up1916arrow-down1imageRednote right nowlemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square693fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-25 months agoSo is the US, and we still have farms, small businesses, and small factories
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•5 months agoMissing the “child labor” reference on your comment makes it very funny.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•5 months agoI mean, the US has that too. My point is that a nation being rich really doesn’t prevent having those businesses or using them for child labor at all.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•5 months agoI got it, but it’s sounds like the US have small (in size) businesses and factories, not that small business and factories use child labor.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•5 months ago So is the US, and we still have farms, small businesses, and small factories I think it should be “and we still have child labor in farms, small businesses…” Without the “child labor in” the comment sounds funny to me.
So is the US, and we still have farms, small businesses, and small factories
Missing the “child labor” reference on your comment makes it very funny.
I mean, the US has that too. My point is that a nation being rich really doesn’t prevent having those businesses or using them for child labor at all.
I got it, but it’s sounds like the US have small (in size) businesses and factories, not that small business and factories use child labor.
Both are true. What’s your point?
I think it should be “and we still have child labor in farms, small businesses…”
Without the “child labor in” the comment sounds funny to me.
Ok