• Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    -or- because they have been intentionally avoiding record preservation requirements.

    It’s this one

    dipshits didn’t choose it for being the right tool for the job here, as it certainly is not.

    It was, actually. If they weren’t dipshits it wouldn’t have been a problem.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Signal, on your personal device, is fine for personal use. It is absolutely not fine for classified communication as the VP or head of DoD, as there are billions of dollars dedicated to compromising your phone.

      The encryption doesn’t mean shit if they breach an endpoint or account.

      If it was strictly personal chat, yeah, no problem, but they just have to assume the messages are being read by other nations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        That’s absolutely correct. Everyone seems to fixate on the encryption, but hackers are lazy and they’ll attack whatever is weakest. In this case that means the storage on the phone after it’s decrypted.

        Don’t store classified information on your phone, regardless of what you use to transmit it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Or better yet, do whatever the heck security experts tell you to do. I can only imagine what’s standard procedure for the president’s cabinet.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Exactly. I can guess as to what decent OPSec looks like, but that’s not my job and I’m not an expert. If you’re in a sensitive position, listen to the experts. If you’re a hobbyist, do whatever strikes your fancy.