@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected] • 1 month agoShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?message-square73fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down16
arrow-up142arrow-down1message-squareShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 month agoSorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph. Good try though. ;)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 month agoHah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍 As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 month agoI actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.) And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.
Sorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph.
Good try though. ;)
Hah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍
As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
I actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.)
And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.