@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down124
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThat’s exactly what I was getting at. Getting length of an empty list would not even enter the loop.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoYes. If it’s empty. But in cases where you need to check, it might as well not be.
That’s exactly what I was getting at. Getting length of an empty list would not even enter the loop.
Yes. If it’s empty. But in cases where you need to check, it might as well not be.