@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down124
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square150fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoThat’s exactly what I was getting at. Getting length of an empty list would not even enter the loop.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoYes. If it’s empty. But in cases where you need to check, it might as well not be.
That’s exactly what I was getting at. Getting length of an empty list would not even enter the loop.
Yes. If it’s empty. But in cases where you need to check, it might as well not be.