• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4212 days ago

    I got curious and your assumption is correct for one of the limiting factors.

    Here is what I found:

    • The shell must be strong enough to support the egg’s weight and protect the embryo, but thin enough for the chick to break through when hatching.
    • As size increases, the weight grows cubically (volume), but shell strength only increases quadratically (surface area), so there’s a point where the shell would have to be too thick to hatch from.
    • The distance from the shell to the center increases.
    • Oxygen diffusion becomes inefficient, and the embryo could suffocate.
    • Larger eggs are harder to keep at a uniform temperature.
    • Birds incubating the eggs would need to generate and distribute more heat, which is physically demanding.
    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      412 days ago

      Didn’t think I would find egg facts so interesting… Cool!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        That’s eggcellent and I’m eggstatic that you enjoyed. Come back next Easter for more egg facts.

        • Victor
          link
          fedilink
          111 days ago

          Benedict!

          I don’t think I’m doing this right.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 days ago

        No problem. I get curious myself so figure it nice to share with people that don’t tell me they’re not interested in useless facts.

    • Max
      link
      fedilink
      111 days ago

      I think point two may be wrong. The strength of a shell should be proportional to its thickness, which would scale linearly with its size (assuming the shell got thicker in proportion to the size). There’s definitely a point where a self supporting egg requires very thick shells like you said, but the scaling law you gave uses the wrong change.