That’s not completing a task. That’s faking a result for appearance.

Is that what you’re advocating for ?

If I ask an llm to tell me the difference between aeolian mode and Dorian mode in the field of music , and it gives me the wrong info, then no it’s not working as intended

See I chose that example because I know the answer. The llm didn’t. But it gave me an answer. An incorrect one

I want you to understand this. You’re fighting the wrong battle. The llms do make mistakes. Frequently. So frequently that any human who made the same amount of mistakes wouldn’t keep their job.

But the investment, the belief in a.i is so engrained for some of us who so want a bright and technically advanced future, that you are now making excuses for it. I get it. I’m not insulting you. We are humans. We do that. There are subjects I am sure you could point at where I do this as well

But a.i.? No. It’s just wrong so often. It’s not it’s fault. Who knew that when we tried to jump ahead in the tech timeline, that we should have actually invented guardrail tech first?

Instead we let the cart go before the horses, AGAIN, because we are dumb creatures , and now people are trying to force things that don’t work correctly to somehow be shown to be correct.

I know. A mouthful. But honestly. A.i. is poorly designed, poorly executed, and poorly used.

It is hastening the end of man. Because those who have been singing it’s praises are too invested to admit it.

It simply ain’t ready.

Edit: changed “would” to “wouldn’t”