@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-22 days agoPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square324fedilinkarrow-up1948arrow-down124
arrow-up1924arrow-down1external-linkPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-22 days agomessage-square324fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 days agoThe original copyright law was created to protect authors from publishers. The current law is an abomination and should be removed.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 day agoYou’re probably right, but saying we should abolish it altogether is insane. There’s a good reason we have these laws.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 day agoReally? Artists getting paid for their work isn’t a good reason?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-214 hours agoArTistS gettiNg paId (after universal gets a 40% cuts because you used the snare sample from Taylor swift ofc)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•12 hours agoSo what’s the alternative? How else would a professional artist make a living?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•15 hours agoYou don’t need a copyright for that. Copyright doesn’t pay anyone anything.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•12 hours agoI genuinely feel like I’m talking to a wall here.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•58 minutes agoThat’s because you don’t understand what copyright legally is.
The original copyright law was created to protect authors from publishers. The current law is an abomination and should be removed.
You’re probably right, but saying we should abolish it altogether is insane. There’s a good reason we have these laws.
There are no good reasons.
Really? Artists getting paid for their work isn’t a good reason?
ArTistS gettiNg paId (after universal gets a 40% cuts because you used the snare sample from Taylor swift ofc)
So what’s the alternative? How else would a professional artist make a living?
You don’t need a copyright for that. Copyright doesn’t pay anyone anything.
I genuinely feel like I’m talking to a wall here.
That’s because you don’t understand what copyright legally is.