• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 hours ago

    It does “support” LVM, but with a wacky/hacky workaround and that’s a real shame !

    Also, there is some talking on github on how they will probably completely drop LVM in the near futur… That’s not what someone should expect from a Linux installer!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Also, there is some talking on github on how they will probably completely drop LVM in the near futur… That’s not what someone should expect from a Linux installer!

      It’s a shitshow. Looking at their repo’s issues list has lots of noise, but the worst of them is that the LVM issue has been open for over a year now. Sure, open source, anyone’s free to work on it by why would distros use such a feature incomplete installer?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 hours ago

        well now I understand why is suse transitioning to a different installer instead of improving it

      • flatbield
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 hours ago

        Using LVM is advanced. No nontechnical user should consider.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          113 hours ago

          Not really an “Average Windows/MacOS user will run into” issue but most power users would run into it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          114 hours ago

          I don’t think that’s true. Administration tools could build on top of it, like snapshotting, which even if it does not work the best that way, it will work. and that can just run in the background, automatically, just like it does with snapper on btrfs now on some systems.