If so, what are some misconceptions or seldom known facts?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Always very annoying listening to dipshits for whom history began in 2022 lament on how Ukraine’s sovereignty was violated and they should be allowed to align themselves without interference. Just as long as they don’t align against the west in which case you perform a violent coup on the behalf of neo-nazis who begin campaigns of ethnic cleansing.

    But that didn’t happen doesn’t matter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -104 days ago

      There is no scenario where a country can unilaterally help themselves to the internationally recognized territory of another. That this simple truth is even in question to you entirely dismisses any point you are trying to make.

      Russia has no claim in any way shape or form to any territory that is not currently internationally recognized as theirs, doesn’t matter if the country was in the SU, Warsaw pact, russian imperial sphere, has russians living there, has russia feel “encroached upon”, or any other imbecilic pretense apologists like to bring forward. It isn’t theirs.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        114 days ago

        Burgerland occupies Hawaii and part of Cuba just to name a couple of places, but sure it’s defending sovereignty of a nation where it overthrew the legitimate government in a violent coup. 🤡

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            link
            fedilink
            124 days ago

            The states is literally running a proxy war against Russia using Ukraine, but yeah we’ll just ignore that important context because it doesn’t fit with the narrative you’re peddling right?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -64 days ago

              And what would that be? I think i was pretty clear. I want russia to stay within their borders, for all I care they can oppress each other until the end of days. Though I would, unsurprisingly, not shed a tear if the country collapses. Same goes for the states.

              I also already gave you a reason why I don’t believe it a worthwhile use of my time to engage with this literal whataboutism on a serious level.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                6
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                whataboutism is a crybully whine about being held to any kind of standard. It’s a shield for you to act in bad faith and not be called on it. It lets you lie about Iraqis killing infants in respirators and act like a smug piece of shit denouncing people when they point out your side is bombing baby food factories. It proves that your words mean shit. You’re nothing but a vulgar nationalist. Morals are for moral victories. And it’s only ever time to talk about how evil the empire’s enemies are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        Usually when you post beneath a comment it’s understood to be a reply to that comment, which doesn’t seem to be the case here because you’re completely talking around everything I said in the comment above.

        Speaking of imbecilic though, what’s your point at all? “You’re not allowed to do the thing you did fait accompli because it’s against the rules I made”

        Baby brain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -84 days ago

          That this simple truth is even in question to you entirely dismisses any point you are trying to make.

          I don’t need to engage with you over this. We fundamentally disagree on a moral absolute.