• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yes? That is not that unusual and it is mentioned in the third sentence of the article.

      As I rode up to the 14th floor, my eyes were drawn to a screen built into the side of the lift.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        Those screens can easily run on an integrated Raspberry Pi microcontroller, they dont exactly have complex graphics

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 day ago

          We are far away from the release of the Raspberry Pi if that screen is running an early version of Windows CE. Putting a PC in the elevator to drive the screen was probably the most cost effective solution.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              There’s not particularly good reason to stop doing it in that scenario either.

              You have an offline technology stack in that elevator that has been doing the job correctly for 20 years. Why take on the expense and risk of changing things that aren’t currently broken?

              It would be crazy if you are building new to resort to that stack, but for an established elevator, why bother?

              Same for some old oscilloscopes at work. I’m not crazy about the choice but I can hardly suggest it would be practical to change it while the oscilloscopes still do their function.

              I would say it’s a problem if the stack is online, but if it is self contained, the age of the software doesn’t make it a problem in and out itself.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 day ago

              New ones probably use something newer. The 20 year old elevator in a hospital will only be upgraded if something breaks.