(not OC)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -629 days ago

    I’d imagine if one genuinely cares about stopping the genocide they’d be exactly as civil as they’d strategically need to be.

    If your excitement in the cancer diagnosis of a old man is more important to you I get why people are weirded out.

    • Flyberius [comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      729 days ago

      Whilst you are bending over to be polite to people, they are responsible for a genocide. But yes, go you for your brave stance with being civil.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -229 days ago

        they are responsible for a genocide

        So then shouldn’t we do everything strategically possible to oppose the genocide?

        Why is “we should adopt the best strategy possible to stop genocide” so offensive to you?

        • Flyberius [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Sorry, but you are suggesting that the best strategy possible to stop the genocide is to be nice to the person committing the genocide. Can you explain to me how that helps stop the genocide because I’m clearly to dense to grasp it.

          Maybe you could point to some recent examples where genocides were stopped by being really nice to the perpetrators.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -328 days ago

            Sorry, but you are suggesting that the best strategy possible to stop the genocide is to be nice to the person committing the genocide

            No, I suggested we adopt the best strategy regardless of what it is.

            You said that even if the best strategy possible is to be nice, you wouldn’t consider doing do.