The shooting took place late Wednesday outside the Capital Jewish Museum, which was hosting an American Jewish Committee event at the time of the incident.

US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem announced the deaths in an X post, saying, “We are actively investigating and working to get more information to share.”

The suspect, identified as 30-year-old Elias Rodriquez of Chicago, Illinois, “chanted 'Free, free Palestine,’ while in custody,” she added.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    2017 days ago

    Was he a civilian who was murdered or was he an active participant in a brutal mass murder of Palestinian women children and men, covered by countries which are participants in the genocide?

    Anyways, the second amendment exists to combat tyranny.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -116 days ago

      Anyways, the second amendment exists to combat tyranny.

      Just want to step in here and say that no interpretation of the second would cover a civilian killing a foreign diplomat, no matter how tyrannical 😂

      • AreaSIX
        link
        fedilink
        216 days ago

        Being employed by an embassy doesn’t magically make you a diplomat my guy. Not saying that the 2nd would cover it in any case, but still.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -817 days ago

      He is by definition a civilian that was murdered. Legal definitions do not care about our political opinions. It appears to be very likely he was a civilian who deserved to be murdered but that does not change the definition

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        1117 days ago

        civilian /sĭ-vĭl′yən/

        noun

        A person who is not an active member of the military, the police, or a belligerent group in a conflict.

        A person who is not an employee of the government.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            11
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            International law is a myth that imperialsists use to murder indigenous resistance fighters, it’s not a real legal regime that actually applies universally.

            There is no legal definition because there is no law, I think that’s pretty clear at this point.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            1017 days ago

            It is according to DuckDuckGo

            But the definition changes based on who you ask. What is more relevant is whether they are part of a beligirent force akin to ISIS but worse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -7
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              This is a dictionary definition. Non-combatant ISIS members are also civilians. Whether they deserve to die or not has no legal bearing. Im unsure why that is considered controversial.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                917 days ago

                Because this is a “rule” which is never applied to any signature to the Geneva Convention. It is solely brought up to virtue signal in favor of the empire.

                These days Israel is publicly bombing Hamas government officials for the crime of being in their finance ministry and nobody bats an eye. They are bombing journalists inside of hospitals for doing journalism and it is a-ok.

                This is what my username is a reference to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        416 days ago

        Last I checked, the western world had made it very clear that international law does not consider killing civilians murder.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        416 days ago

        excellent point, killing innocent civilians is very wrong. As is starving them and abusing them for 80 years. All those things, just plain wrong, no matter the reasoning.