• Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 days ago

    If bitcoin didn’t use 40 terawatts to mine and was more reasonable in its electricity demand then I don’t think that many people would care about it. It still wouldn’t make it useful but at least it wouldn’t be actively damaging the environment.

    We might even be able to find a use for it at that point. But as it stands now the energy requirements essentially make the technology not worth it given the very minor benefits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -34 days ago

      There are versions of cryptocurrencies that don’t use massive amounts of energy.

      Pick anything launched from Ethereum onwards.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You are glossing over 40% of a $3T market.

          I’m not going to defend PoW (doge and monero are both pre Eth) but blockchain technology has moved on even if the fanboys haven’t.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -24 days ago

              That’s as irrational as saying no-one can use EVs until we get rid of all ICE vehicles.

              • Echo Dot
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 days ago

                Wait but that’s like saying that as long as the world has at least one electric car the internal combustion engine can continue to exist without issue.

                If the vast majority of cryptocurrencies are still power hungry and the most commonly used cryptocurrency is power hungry then the fact that some of the others are better doesn’t really help.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -24 days ago

                  that’s like saying that as long as the world has at least one electric car the internal combustion engine can continue to exist without issue.

                  No. PoS (EV makers) are not supporting the existence of PoW (ICE vehicles). In fact, one builder made a deliberate planned move from PoW to PoS. All new builders are PoS.

                  the vast majority of cryptocurrencies are still power hungry

                  False. Remove Bitcoin (>100TWh) and the only PoW coin in the top 10 is DOGE (~4TWh).

                  • Echo Dot
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 days ago

                    Oh great so if you remove bitcoin your argument works, trouble is, bitcoin exists

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  04 days ago

                  Your dislike of PoW is totally understandable.

                  Bitcoin maxis who dismiss all other blockchains as Alts are very much like climate deniers. They illogically block improvements and efficiencies in the Bitcoin protocol (e.g. block size increases).

                  However if enery usage is your main criticism then attacking PoS is like campaigning against wind or solar. We want PoS to completely replace PoW.