• bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 days ago

    Bezels or not phones are still too large to be comfortable to use for many people.

    5.8" with no bezel would be a great size. Something comparable to an old 4-4.2" phone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 days ago

      Like I just said, my current 6.3" display phone is almost identical in size to my old 4.2" one.

      • bitwolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Yes but that’s still 2.1" too large to be comfortable to use for many people.

        My 6" Pixel is just as uncomfortable to use as my 4" Nexus S was. 99.99% screen to body won’t change that fact.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 days ago

          I don’t think that’s true in the slightest. A phone 2.1" smaller in diagonal length than my current one would be smaller than a Nokia 3310.

          • bitwolf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Yes but the phone physically cannot be smaller than the screen.

            So if the screen itself is too large to be comfortable, it is physically impossible to make it comfortable to use without making the screen smaller.

            I measured the radius my thumb can reach, I know exactly the limits of my reach, and thus exactly the largest screen I can use without causing discomfort in my wrist.

            The point I am trying to make is that the ideal phone size is personal to the individual. There is no one size fits all. Screen to body ratio cannot change that.

            This is why, despite the screen to body ratio improving, a subset of people still ask for smaller phones.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              06 days ago

              Ok so you think that the old 4" screen phones should actually have been sub 2". That seems excessively small to me.