But I feel like even if they feel in some conflicted sense, contrarily, there’s still an impulse to respond
Edit: i feel like this might be the basis behind when lawyers treat witnesses as hostile: make a bunch of claims that can be variably supported/assessed and you can get somewhat closer in the assurance that the witness at issue is going to have some feelings about the matter at hand
I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make. It seems like what you’re saying doesn’t follow the conversation logically. I think that’s why the other commenter asked if you’re ok.
All humans? No. There are plenty of people who couldn’t care less what you want to know.
deleted by creator
Does it? I love answering questions and I answered yours
But I feel like even if they feel in some conflicted sense, contrarily, there’s still an impulse to respond
Edit: i feel like this might be the basis behind when lawyers treat witnesses as hostile: make a bunch of claims that can be variably supported/assessed and you can get somewhat closer in the assurance that the witness at issue is going to have some feelings about the matter at hand
I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make. It seems like what you’re saying doesn’t follow the conversation logically. I think that’s why the other commenter asked if you’re ok.
Can you pinpoint where this “concern” began? I really can’t understanf although I maybe shouldn’t have commented on this particular branching off
deleted by creator
All humans, no. Some humans, yes. They’re obviously part of category B.
Yup. I work at a huge home improvement store and people think I know the details on every product!
I’ve just started pulling out my phone to ask chatgpt for lots of these questions.
“What kind of spackle should I use on the surface of the moon?”
“Sorry sir we have 50,000 products in this store. I’m gonna ask GPT-4”