Grayox to [email protected] • 2 years agoHow did this break rule 1? Did you just not read the 2nd panel?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1475arrow-down1101
arrow-up1374arrow-down1imageHow did this break rule 1? Did you just not read the 2nd panel?lemmy.mlGrayox to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoEven if that argument was viable, I would argue Israel’s genocide starting less than a century ago makes it much more imperative to act against it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•2 years agoSo instead we should genocide Israelis or what is your suggestion?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoPalestinians taking their land back is justice after a century of genocide, not genocide.
Even if that argument was viable, I would argue Israel’s genocide starting less than a century ago makes it much more imperative to act against it.
So instead we should genocide Israelis or what is your suggestion?
Palestinians taking their land back is justice after a century of genocide, not genocide.
Do you mean the settlements in the Westbank?