• TheHarpyEagle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Doesn’t need to be super advanced AI to be used as a tool by irresponsible or malicious humans.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Lol at this account spamming AI related posts with angry unintelligible comments and trying to bait people into arguments

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        Zero art has been stolen.

        You cannot steal a jpg.

        And protecting copyright is supporting big corporations.

        • HeartyBeast
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          And protecting copyright is supporting big corporations.

          Apart from - you know, all the photographers, designers, authors and musicians out there.

          • Deceptichum
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You mean the ones who routinely come out saying how X corporation stole their work and they received nothing for it?

            The ones where if you try to challenge the corporations hoarding human cultural works you’ll find yourself in a legal battle you can’t afford to enter.

            The amount of times an artist “wins” in the system vs a corporation is laughable. It’s designed to protect you and I, like the rest of the legal system does (it doesn’t).

            • HeartyBeast
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              You mean the ones who routinely come out saying how X corporation stole their work and they received nothing for it?

              Yes.The ones who routinely use copyright to get some form of payment. I know several people who had their photographs reublished by the Daily Mail and subsequently got payment. It happens. It’s an imperfect system, but still one that allows small artists to make a living.

              he amount of times an artist “wins” in the system vs a corporation is laughable.

              I mean, it really isn’t. It’s the entire backbone of an industry whereby, for example a photographer or illustrator can supply woirk to a magazine on a single use license. It’s how people who supply photo libraries make a living. It’s how small bands have at least some protection.

              • Deceptichum
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                The difference is, even if it worked properly I would still not be in favour of denying people freedom to use cultural works.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      -81 year ago

      Nothing like the thrill of being part of an angry mob! All the dopamine of righteous fury, none of the responsibility.