[email protected]
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago

title

i.imgur.com

message-square
95
fedilink
782

title

i.imgur.com

@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago
message-square
95
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    98•1 year ago

    Not just guys, let me tell you

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24•1 year ago

      Yeah I definitely want one

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19•1 year ago

        I mean, if anyone, Captain Lezbian is the person who needs to have one

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7•1 year ago

      Guys is technically a non-gendered term - FWIW

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8•1 year ago

        I haven’t seen it used much in a non-gendered way, so I guess that’s why it has a clear masculine ring in my head

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16•1 year ago

          It is very common to hear girls use the term guys, and for people to address a mixed party as “guys”

      • Lem Jukes
        link
        fedilink
        5•1 year ago

        Just like ‘mankind’ right? (/s)

        Sure, language is changing and guys has been veering neutral since the 70s. But claiming the word is outright “non-gendered” is incorrect imo.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4•1 year ago

          Merriam-Webster would like to disagree with your assertion that it is not “non-gendered”

          Thanks to @[email protected] for the link in https://lemmy.ml/comment/7077751 (I don’t know if I could make that link in a better way)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0•1 year ago

            I agree that “guys” is not a gendered term but I don’t like your argument.

            Definitions of words can be very different to how people use them, and we shouldn’t constrain the use of words to their definitions.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2•1 year ago

              I disagree that we shouldn’t constrain the use of words to their definitions. It’s what helps make the meaning of sentences the most clear for everyone. If people had actually done that then the definition of “literally” wouldn’t include “figuratively” and a lot of misunderstandings could be avoided.

              Otherwise we could end up with people saying that when they wrote “all white people deserve to die” what they actually meant was that they deserve to live, since that’s how they use the word “die”. It’s nonsensical to me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3•1 year ago

          Kind of a bad example, because mankind very clearly stems from ‘humankind’. And people are lazy and prefer using short words. The unfairness is rather that women got stuck with the words requiring more characters. But that is a phenomenon of the English language and not present in others.

          However, in most languages the words for man/male are closer to human(kind) than female/woman, which very clearly shows the historic patriarchal influence, coming back around to your point after all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3•1 year ago

            Interestingly enough, in old English you had “werman” and “wifman” for man and woman respectively, in which case referring to all with “mankind” makes perfect sense. So the originator for mankind seems more likely to be from that than the explanation that it’s a shortening of “humankind” to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3•1 year ago

        Not technically. Practically. In real world. As slang.

        Cause technically and by definition, It’s still very much gendered.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3•1 year ago

          No, sorry. Please check the facts before correcting someone.

          In its plural form “guys” is technically non-gendered:

          https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guy

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1•1 year ago

        What’s gals then?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5•1 year ago

      Nicole Coenen has joined the chat

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5•1 year ago

      Oh good, so it’s just the OP who doesn’t have their shit straight.

  • Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73•1 year ago

    96 volt? This thing fucks

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61•1 year ago

    Hell yeah

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22•1 year ago

      Hell yeah

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51•1 year ago

    I’ll take weapons that are as dangerous to the wielder as anyone else for $500…

    • rockerface 🇺🇦
      link
      fedilink
      35•1 year ago

      You could say it’s a double-edged sword

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4•1 year ago

        I think that one may have more than two edges XD

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      20•
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even Warhammer 40000 chainswords usually have the blade shielded from the wielder’s side. Yes, even the chaos and ork ones.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3•1 year ago

        It’s made for plunge cuts!

    • rockerface 🇺🇦
      link
      fedilink
      2•1 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    46•1 year ago

    Holy Chainsword, blessed be thy Machine Spirit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38•1 year ago

    For the emperor

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3•1 year ago

      BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3•1 year ago

        SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38•1 year ago

    Hell yeah

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38•1 year ago

    the Emperor protects!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9•1 year ago

      Not Cadia tho

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12•1 year ago

        The planet broke before the Guard did.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -3•
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          According to the Minka Lesk omnibus after the Cadia destruction they did broke for a time before gathering their remains and losing half of their remaining numbers in incredibly suicidal but spectacular attack just to show the rest of Guard they didn’t lost the edge.

  • Gormadt
    link
    fedilink
    28•1 year ago

    If I pull this out of a stump do I get to be king?

    It’s a cool shelf piece but in terms of practicality I’m to attached to my extremities to dare to turn it on

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19•1 year ago

      Listen, strange women lyin’ near trees distributin’ swords is no basis for a system of government. That said, if you do pull it from a stump I’m not going to try and take it from you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16•1 year ago

      Excalumber

    • MacN'Cheezus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5•1 year ago

      King of the lumberyard

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    27•1 year ago

    Is it time to rip and tear?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    25•1 year ago

    Aesthetically? Hell yeah. Functionally? I am not taking a sword that can run out of juice to the battlefield.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
      link
      fedilink
      26•1 year ago

      This is the kind of weapon you bring to a battle expected to be so bloody you die before it does

    • KptnAutismus
      link
      fedilink
      9•1 year ago

      a back-mounted generator is still an option, although it just prolongs the inevitable.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22•1 year ago

    Please tell me the Chainsword is a weapon in some game?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26•1 year ago

      Any Warhammer game

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16•1 year ago

      You poor sweet summer child…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11•1 year ago

      Oh boy, is it ever

    • bruhduh
      link
      fedilink
      1•1 year ago

      Fallout series be like

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22•1 year ago

    Hell yeah!

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    20•1 year ago

    People are supposed to see Kite Man and think “hell yeah.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    19•
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

[email protected]

[email protected]

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 2.58K users / day
  • 4.16K users / week
  • 8.88K users / month
  • 23K users / 6 months
  • 50.4K subscribers
  • 11.2K Posts
  • 141K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop
  • @[email protected]
  • Cyclohexane
  • Arthur Besse
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org