• TrustingZebra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1632 years ago

    Final paragraph sums it best:

    Don’t want any bloatware or subscription services preinstalled on your computer? Consider installing Linux instead of Windows the next time you’re reinstalling your computer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        182 years ago

        Guess it depends on the industry. I’m a web developer so it doesn’t matter what OS I use, and frankly it’s far easier to install and configure the tools I need on Linux than it is on Windows. I can leave a Linux system online for weeks at a time, which in some cases is the entire length of a contract.

        Windows is good, but it requires just as much training as any other system to become a real power user.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          I disagree. If you consider a power user using PowerShell or terminal, then sure. But simple things on windows are more complex on Linux. Like installing a program, if you can do it through snap or apt get then great, still more complex for the average user compared to windows where you just download and click.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        For most things, Linux just works. There are specialized apps like cad packages, graphic design and such that are very problematic on Linux but most of it is fine. Just look at how successful Chromebooks are. They’re all Linux.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        That’s funny, that’s the reason I ditched Windows completely. The workflow is just so bad on it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Sure, and once you’ve clicked through the “finish setting up windows” pop up that inexplicably appears every few reboots, done the mandatory updates it keeps nagging you about and threatening to reboot if you happen to walk away for too long, and cleared out all the ads in your notifications, you can get right to it!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -52 years ago

      Most of us actually have software to run, not endlessly tinkering with a failed desktop OS

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Lemmy has a strong bias towards Linux. I wouldn’t say Linux is a failed desktop OS (but hey look at the marketshare) but the transition to Linux is not easy for majority of less tech savvy users. I know you guys have setup Debian/Ubuntu for your grandma and it has been working great since, you don’t have to repeat that.

        As someone who’s been trying to move over to Linux for years and fallback to Windows every time I tried, there’s always issues I need to troubleshoot, the most recent one would be mixed refresh rate monitors ie. running at 60Hz instead of 144Hz until I made specific change to a config file. And as a gamer, it makes it even harder - I am aware Proton is a thing now and ‘most’ games work out of the box, I have Steam Deck for my portable needs. Pay attention to the keyword ‘most’, when it doesn’t work, I ain’t wanna spend my previous time to troubleshoot so that I can play the game.

        As for my Windows 11 experience, it hasn’t been that bad. There’s no more active prompts for update and restart your computer now or the world will end. UI also looks better with minimal tweaks. Is privacy concern something I should care more? Absolutely, but at this stage of my life, I value more on the consistency and expected behaviour from my PC.

        Server use case on the other hand, Linux > all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        a failed desktop OS

        Windows still has over 60% of desktop market share. You may not like it, but it isn’t a failed OS.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I was with you on the software compatibility point, but then you completely lost me with “failed desktop OS”…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 years ago

        Well yeah, because we don’t have the marketing billions and monopoly that Microsoft/Apple enjoy. So we gotta do the promoting ourselves.

          • imecth
            link
            fedilink
            102 years ago

            Linux has hundreds of distributions, plenty of which feature gui alternatives like Linux Mint, everything’s not arch. I’ll remind you console commands are a thing on windows as well.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 years ago

            Lol, tell me you don’t know anything about Linux without telling me you don’t know anything about Linux.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I was just thinking about this recently, there’s a lot of talk about HDR and nit brightness specs and such recently, but I must be the only one that finds current panels too eye-searingly bright. My current IPS monitor is set at 2% brightness and it’s just comfortable enough for daily use. Even my OLED TVs don’t have brightness set over 10%.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I mean yeah I have the same issue too (escept I use around 20-25% brightness on my OLED). But HDR is about more than just brightness. For me it’s worth it for the extra colors—especially teal—which SDR displays struggle the most at reproducing accurately.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Interesting observation on the colours! To be honest I never got past the brightness when I turned it on. I couldn’t get past a couple of minutes before feeling like my eyes were being burned by the hellfires of Satan’s asshole.

            Granted it might be the IPS panel (aw3821dw), so I would have to upgrade to an ultra wide 220ppi OLED to test out this HDR that everyone’s raving about when it becomes available … for science. RIP my wallet.

      • Bakkoda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I was honestly a little disappointed in how HDR looked. Maybe I didn’t calibrate or set my colors properly. Dunno.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          What kind of panel technology? You really need an OLED to get a decent HDR image. My old VA TV looked so washed out in HDR, so I never used it.