• Caveman
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Depends on where you live and your situation. You either limit your personal CO2 or the society’s CO2 or even both. Most of my suggestions will make or save you money over time.

    For personal you could do these, most of these will pay themselves back within 10 years in savings.

    • Swap gas stove for induction stove
    • Swap a gas boiler to heat pump + electric boiler
    • Buy solar panels for the roof and/or battery
    • Heat pump for domestic heating for colder regions.
    • Home insulation such as triple glass windows
    • For hot regions getting an awning for the windows facing the sun goes a long way.
    • Selling car to buy EV (CO2 neutral at 1 year, less CO2 after that)
    • Buying an E-bike if you have short trips and would like to bike more (CO2 negative almost instantly if you prevent car trips)

    Otherwise if you don’t feel like any of those investing in solar companies or battery production companies will make it easier for them to finance expansions to their operations and maybe even make you some money along the way.

    If you live in the UK or applicable countries getting in on Octopus energy co-op energy production is a good way to invest the money and reduce CO2 at the same time.

    Don’t forget that an easy way to limit your carbon footprint is free. Notably plastics, aluminum, steel, other metals, concrete and beef.

    To limit society’s footprint you can show up to city Council meetings and advocate for bike paths and public transport which really goes a long way. Showing up with a couple of buddies, making them talk and buying beer for them after in one of the most cost effective ways to stop climate change. Often city council members just need some people to back them up when proposing the CO2 negative urban planning improvements.

    Stopping climate change is all about taking small steps towards the solution, asking this question on lemmy is a great start.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 day ago

    Use it to free your own time to plant trees or contribute in another way. Spending 10k isn’t gonna reduce climate change, but being able to work on the problem yourself will.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 day ago

    Considering we live in a conflicted world where capitalism has ruined everything, I’d say donate a few thousand of it around, but also save it and just make the right choices on what you buy:

    • buy zero waste, local and bio
    • buy fair and repairable phones
    • buy fair and ecological clothing
    • etc…

    So many people don’t realize that every time they buy something in a store, they are casting a little capitalistic vote. We have to speak the language of what these evil sons of bitches speak, money. So I think for individuals, it mostly starts with us.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      215 hours ago

      Look at the bright side, with rampant inflation and wage stagnation; soon no one will be able to buy anything anymore!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      212 hours ago

      You’ll need 100 Musks

      To reach a catastrophic level on all kinds of scales - including climate change…

      If you mean the net-worth, you might be right, that amount of money might even have a measurable effect on human-made climate change.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    142 days ago

    As I havent seen a single actually effective answer:

    Donate it to organisations fighting climate change. For example FCA (researching climate friendly ways of producing cement, steel, fuels), gfi (researching food alternatives), CATF (tries to influence political changes)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Buy the cheapest viable land you can and build an Earthship home out of tires, cans, bottles, and compressed Earth. Take yourself off the grid as much as possible.

    I’d also suggest a career in or adjacent to alternative energy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 days ago

    10k will not do much good on the grand scale of things. Once you start involving other people directly, the costs start skyrocketing. Be it if you want to bribe politicians, fund a revolution, invest into sustainable tech or just creating a bottle cap recycling programme, 10k just isnt gonna get you far enough. So focus on your own climate impact. I think the absolute best you could do for the most positive net good is to take inventory of your own carbon emissions and replace or upgrade whatever you need to lower them. Lower your heating usage by getting a heat pump instead of burning coal for example. This will depend on how low your carbon output currently is though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You would be so very surprised how far a little money gets public opinion.

        Especially when you cut out the middlemen and fund independent creators you find impactful, instead of big megacorp news with CEO salaries in the millions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    742 days ago

    The only ways you can fight climate change in any meaningful way with 10k also involve going to prison

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 hours ago

        I think that depends on your skill, i.e. good planning, and obviously execution. If you’re really good, you don’t even get caught, although that might help politically as we currently see with Mangione

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 days ago

      10k is cutting it thin… the Accuracy International ACSR is just a hair under $10k USD… and that is before taxes. Then you need the 1,000-10,000 rounds of ammo for training before you become good enough to start taking out card-carrying members of the Parasite Class from a kilometre-plus distance.

      Now granted, you can go a lot cheaper than that, but accuracy and range will suffer. Remember, you want to be far enough away that you can reliably pack up and sanitize the scene before you leave.

      Alternatively, swarming AI drones in the hundreds, with on-board explosive packages, would allow you to deploy from abandonable emplacements that can loiter for many hours to even days. No-one is going to question a cube van that sits in a paid spot for a week, at least until it’s roof opens up and a thousand tiny drones with facial recognition take off and take out a few oligarchs.

      But honestly, you’re likely talking a few tens of thousands for that scenario, at minimum. I would likely bank at it being in the low hundreds of thousands for a truly effective and difficult-to-counter deployment.

    • Kuori [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 days ago

      The only ways you can fight climate change in any meaningful way […] involve going to prison

      correct

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 days ago

      10k is cutting it thin… the Accuracy International ACSR is just a hair under $10k USD… and that is before taxes. Then you need the 1,000-10,000 rounds of ammo for training before you become good enough to start taking out card-carrying members of the Parasite Class from a kilometre-plus distance.

      Now granted, you can go a lot cheaper than that, but accuracy and range will suffer. Remember, you want to be far enough away that you can reliably pack up and sanitize the scene before you leave.

      Alternatively, swarming AI drones in the hundreds, with on-board explosive packages, would allow you to deploy from abandonable emplacements that can loiter for many hours to even days. No-one is going to question a cube van that sits in a paid spot for a week, at least until it’s roof opens up and a thousand tiny drones with facial recognition take off and take out a few oligarchs.

      But honestly, you’re likely talking a few tens of thousands for that scenario, at minimum. I would likely bank at it being in the low hundreds of thousands for a truly effective and difficult-to-counter deployment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 days ago

        I wouldn’t even want to be in an Austrian luxury prison. There’s a reason why people have went as far as dying while fighting for their freedom, it’s one of our most precious possessions.

  • GingaNinga
    link
    fedilink
    912 days ago

    solar panels or something? No one is stopping climate change with $10K, I don’t even think $10B would make a substantial dent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 days ago

      I think they’re just asking, from a categorical imperative perspective, what is the most effective way for all individuals with a bit of savings to help the climate situation.

      And tbh, at this point OP is probably better off spending that $10k on preparing for:

      • inclimate weather (HVAC, water proofing, warm clothing)
      • inconsistent power (battery backups, a generator)
      • food/clean water shortages (home gardening skills, rain catching/water purification).

      At this point, there’s virtually nothing that can be done to stop the impact of climate change, there is only adapting to survive it. The best we can do is vote and/or hope for our global political situation to finally reach its inevitable crisis point. But I don’t expect that to be a pleasant experience.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      212 days ago

      10B could make a couple underground metro lines in an otherwise extremely car dependent city with no public transport

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 hours ago

        More effective would probably to buy yourself (or a person that has political potential/influence with the right intentions) into politics like president muskrat, and do well placed populistic propaganda against the actually evil fossil industry. You don’t even have to lie, just do some good rethoric speech, ads etc… We need policies on a larger level, and I think 10B$ should be enough to gain significant political influence for something that the major mass of people is already behind of, just needs a good spark. I think Thunberg has shown that. Not that we shouldn’t of course improve public transport in cities. Additionally do (employ) investigative journalism probably in the same process to give all of this a good foundation…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        113 hours ago

        10K is a home solar investment. Where I live, people tend to live in multi-family buildings about 3-6 floors high, often split between siblings and their families. Depending on how many are in the country year-round, that might even be enough for the whole building with careful management. Obviously wouldn’t be the same if the neighbors are strangers. (I appreciate that the familial emphasis might seem a bit random in your culture). Ideally 10K might just be enough for one or two households.

        The much more interesting prompt is 10B, imo.

        10B? Oh man. I’m in Lebanon. We’ve effortlessly squandered more generous fortunes than a measly 10B grant, but here’s how I’d do it:

        1B: buses, trams and parking garages to decongest some of the nicer (and underperforming, touristy) old town areas. Should give them a sorely needed boost 3B: modern seaside train running from north to south, with a small number of branches into the interior. Mostly freight. 3B: start phase of a Beirut metro. It’s not enough for a full metro system especially with our geological conditions, but the core city isn’t too big and one line should be feasible? 2B: functional army so we still have civilian infrastructure next time our noisy neighbor gets a hissy fit (infrastructure is worthless if it’s destroyed) 1B: modern fossil fuel power plant. Yeah it’s not green, but we generate a fraction of our needed power, meaning most people have to pay off a local generator mob for electricity. They use diesel and relatively inefficient smaller generators. Our existing ancient power plants use dogshit-tier diesel. I insist that some kind of LNG plant maybe would actually make the situation more green. As it stands the convenience of combustible fuel is more pertinent than the environmental cost

      • GingaNinga
        link
        fedilink
        82 days ago

        Ya its a decent start. My point here is the scale of what we’re facing. Its going to take trillions of dollars, synchronous action taken by many nations simultaneously and a complete restructuring of the current world order. There’s always hope but at this point i’m fairly cynical and don’t have a lot of faith that the right people are in charge to even start the conversation.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 days ago

    Enjoy the money and tell yourself its not your fault.

    Or alternatively, become an eco-terrorist.

    Think of:

    • Pipelines - buy explosives

    • Certain individuals pertaining to the oil industry - buy a firearms

    • Certain politicians - buy firearms

    I am not a lawyer, this comment is for entertainment pur-

    Hmm, why is there loud knocking on my door?