• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    So the woman who in frustration said the “DDD, you’re next” words to insurance company denying her claim is charged with terrorism, but this is fine? even though a lot more non-CEOs have been killed this way on multiple occasions including last week, compared to that one CEO killed in an act that wasn’t even terrorism.

  • pancakes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 day ago

    This looks photoshopped but i don’t know why. The bottom line of text has no warping while the top line + image have more noticable warping.

  • metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    1052 days ago

    Don’t promote violence … against your fellow slaves.

    Get off the fucking road and hurt the people responsible.

  • Draconic NEO
    link
    fedilink
    282 days ago

    Because advocating running people over totally isn’t encouraging violence 🙄

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 days ago

      Assuming the mods name relates to the sub name.

      The sub exists to make fun of those people sharing their message with silly stickers.
      The redditor actively doing the same (obviously not just making fun of the car owner).

  • Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    So obviously this sticker and mod are fucking awful, but it’s worth keeping in mind that, if you’re at a protest or even just crossing the street, it doesn’t matter who’s right when it comes to a car vs the human body if push comes to shove. I’ve seen protesters (rightfully) call out a car for trying to push through them, but they also started mobbing the car, which in turn panicked the driver who then recklessly sped off. Thankfully no one on foot seemed seriously injured, but it made me wonder what they thought was going to happen by surrounding the driver like that. Protest away, but keep your safety (and others) in mind, too.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    322 days ago

    I don’t like the attitude behind it, but taken by itself, the phrase “all lives splatter” is kinda funny.

    Still, you’re a dick if you put this on your car.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s a riff and disparagement of the saying “Black Lives Matter”, which in and of itself rules out any funniness, imo. That it’s about threatening violence against pedestrians just makes it worse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        Could be taken as a riff on “all lives matter”, the racists’ retort to Black Lives Matter. But then you’d need to have tiki torches and klansmen being run over.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -362 days ago

      Agreed, you’re a dick if you put this on your car.

      You’re also a dick if you stand in the road, blocking traffic instead of, say, a gas station.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        452 days ago

        Protests must cause inconvenience or they are simply ignored.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 days ago

          Yeah, that’s kinda my point: How the hell is the oil industry being inconvenienced by obstructing traffic?

          What they are accomplishing by standing in the street is convincing the general public to make jaywalking a felony.

          What they are doing is illegal; they clearly don’t have a problem violating the law to achieve their goals. That doesn’t bother me so much; civil disobedience is a cornerstone of civic action. What pisses me off is that they are targeting victims of the oil industry, rather than the perpetrators.

          If they insist on taking illegal actions, there are plenty they could take without targeting victims. The could rob gas stations or muffler shops, for example. They could threaten to torch new ICE cars on dealer lots. That would force them to hire overnight security, and would raise the insurance rates on every ICE car dealer.

          Target the fucking oil industries, and stay the fuck out of the roads.

          • madjo
            link
            fedilink
            71 day ago

            Not all protests are against oil companies.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 day ago

              Obstructing general traffic is only a valid form of protest if your cause is “increase the penalties for jaywalking” or “general misanthropy”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 day ago

            Oil companies get targeted all the time, but it’s mostly the protests that affect many people that make it to the news

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 day ago

              The last time an ICE car dealership was torched in connection with a protest was four years ago in Kenosha, and it wasn’t even for environmental activism.

              Muffler shops are only necessary for ICE vehicles; When has a muffler shop ever been involved in a protest?

              Many states have emission testing requirements for ICE cars; when have testing facilities ever been targeted by environmental protesters?

              JSO could immediately increase the costs of doing business to ICE dealerships, (and gain notoriety), simply by writing letters to ICE dealerships demanding that they put only electric vehicles on display.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              52 days ago

              A bit of a long shot, isn’t it:

              Unfortunately, the same poll showed that the protest did not have any measurable effect on feelings about the radical group, or climate policy

              So, people didn’t change the way they see the protesters, didn’t support their cause any bit more, but were more sympathetic to people that protested in a less disruptive way (without actually agreeing with them).

              If you want to call this a win, ok, but it’s a really tiny one.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 day ago

                I didn’t say that the protests like this make massive measurable positive effect. You claimed they had negative impacts on what the protestors wanted to achieve. Which according to this single study was incorrect in this instance, and in fact it may help the more moderate protestors.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 day ago

                  You claimed…

                  Dude, you are replying to my first post on the conversation.

                  Anyway, that one study is about a very widely known cause. People don’t change their minds about those easily, neither for supporting nor for opposing it. Also, beware of social studies that find tiny effects.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 days ago

              They have had more success convincing governments to increase the penalties for jaywalking.

              They would have better results picketing a gas station.

              They’d have much better results targeting ICE cars on dealer lots.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I think the road might be a better option than those last two. They’re private property, which gives cops an excuse to beat up protesters for trespassing and refusing to comply.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 day ago

                  The only valid metric to measure against is their stated intent. Harassing the general public is only a “better option” if their intention is to stiffen the laws against jaywalking, as that is the only effect they have managed to achieve.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 day ago

    Funny but I saw the original post and I’m pretty sure the point was to mock or chastise the person who had this bumper sticker, not celebrate it. So it doesn’t seem inconsistent to allow it while also removing that comment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        You cannot do violence against someone else’s property.

        You are property of the ruling class, and so they (or their henchmen) are free to damage you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 day ago

        I completely agree but that’s a conclusion that requires someone to think deeply about these topics and challenge the common definition of words. Most people haven’t done that, so I was setting that aside in this case. I don’t really blame people for not having challenged deeply held belief systems and categories of transgressive behavior in our society, much as I wish they would.

  • sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    As seen on the back of the New Orleans rampager’s blood spattered carnage truck.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 days ago

    Don’t promote violence ^^against your fellow man^ CEOs are Okay though, they can afford security^

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -152 days ago

    I like this kind of humor. Not all protests deserve this, but I’m sure some do.

    #AllLivesSplatter #CarmageddonLife