most people hate ai, but the bots on lemmy are an acception since they bring life to the communities when activities dries up. I mean- am I wrong here?thoughts? opinions?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    442 years ago

    No, we absolutely do not agree on this.

    Even if bots were AI (they aren’t, for the most part), their presence propping up dead communities DOES NOT HELP ANYONE. If nobody’s there talking, it’s because there’s nothing to be said. Either leave it lie until people show up to talk about that topic again, or let it die, and let a different community take its place. Nobody is harmed by communities running out of steam. Conversations do not have to go on forever.

    • livus
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      This. I only come here because I’m interested in what citizens of the fediverse have to say/think is interesting or important.

      If I wanted to know what some bot thinks is important I’d be on a bot aggregate site. Scraper bots are no better, If I wanted redditors to be setting my reading agenda I’d be over there.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Nah, I block all the bots.

    Edit: Settings -> uncheck “show bot accounts”. Done, easy peasy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    I think we should incorporate more ai tech in Lemmy. Like accessibility features and moderation tools.

    but I absolutely hate these post bots. I always feel cheated when I engage because op won’t have a discussion. All blocked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      AI-based moderation tools sound like a recipe for disaster. Facebook has them, and it’s not good.

      • Corgana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Screw whatever “AI moderation” means, A simole “Automod for Lemmy” would be nice!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Emphasis on tools not fully automated system. An ai could flag problematic material and patterns of it it, till we get true agi a human should always verify.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Some bots I tolerate, others not so much, so I block those. The ones that just mine another site for any new content, I block, as I could just go to that site and read it. The piped.video bot that provides an alternate to youtube (when the piped.video link actaully works) I allow, because Youtube will eventual defeat my work around. So it’s more personal taste.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    If the community is dead and it’s only bots posting I don’t think that makes the community any less dead.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -32 years ago

      look at it in perspective, like on this community, alot of people like talking about tech, but when users aren’t posting, they might still seek new content. so when the bots do post something, it brings life to the community and activity. and usually when they do post something it is relatively new if not brand new news articles that bring people together to talk about.

  • e0qdk
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    most people hate ai

    I don’t think that’s true. There’s a lot of concern about it – particularly regarding companies scraping the everloving shit out of the internet and then reselling what they got for free; with it upending the apple cart on difficulty of production (and what that means for various professions); with people using it idiotically in inflexible, unauditable, bureaucratic ways (though they were already doing that “computer says ‘No’” thing even without the new AI techniques; it’s a broader social challenge that involves any computerized processing of people in 2023); etc. – but people are using it as a tool to do really neat things too, and a lot of the results from that are just fun.

    Here’s a few examples of fun AI visual art from threads I’ve seen over the last few weeks:

    For some of these, something similar might have been made eventually (the spiderman one, in particular, I could see actually existing), but for most of them? Nah. Without AI gen they probably just never would’ve been made, and that’d be a shame!

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It might not or mightt be true, I know a lot of artist hate it, you’d be hard pressed to not find any that does not like ai, not saying that no one out of these groups could not appreciate it. I do think ai can be great, but it’s all over the internet, that people just don’t like ai. Might even be 50-50 60-40 who knows, but it’s still a noticable amount.

  • donuts
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Going into a community expecting human interaction and instead finding nothing but bots is like joining a game server only to find out that it’s 18/20 bots. I think it sucks and it’s not what I want. Frankly, if I wanted to talk to AI chat bots (and I really don’t) there is already no shortage of places to do that.

    I do worry a little bit that one day the internet will be so full of AI-generated garbage (words, images, music, etc.) that it will lose most of its value and utility to actual human beings. Centralized corporate social media already has a massive problems with bots and sockpuppets, and technology only seems to be moving in a direction that will make that problem worse. I’m sure the corporate parts of the internet at large will become majority bots sometime in my lifetime, maybe even in just a few years.

    So, whether it’s Mastodon, Peertube, Kbin or whatever, I genuinely think and hope that the Fediverse represents a small opportunity to keep mostly human communities alive and thriving, and so I hope that bots are used rarely and transparently, if at all.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      I get that standpoint, if that’s all you get but on this community, you get bots and also real users here that also creat posts, combine the two then factor in the conversations that form in the comments.

      • donuts
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        By getting a bot to automatically post articles (or worse, comments) you’re decreasing the need/opportunity for human beings to post, which makes the entire website less engaging on an individual level.

        Sure there might be more “content”, but less human-to-human interaction. And personally I feel that genuine human-to-human interaction is only going to become more important with the propagation of mediocre AI generated content. Even thinking in terms of “supply and demand”, unlimited bot-created content has very little value compared to increasingly rare human-to-human interaction.

        Maybe it’s just me, but I’d rather a sub/mag be totally empty than full of AI-generated bot content, because even though it’s not ideal it at least gives people like you and me the opportunity to meaningfully participate.

  • Tippon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    The post bots kill communities.

    There’s not much that’s more frustrating than seeing an interesting looking post, only to find that it’s a link bot and there’s no discussion. I’ve blocked communities for it.

  • pruwyben
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If a community is not very active but there are a lot of bot posts, it just feels like “lipstick on a pig” - they’re trying to make it seem more active than it really is, and diluting what little “real” activity there is.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I thought bots were just scripts that hit an API. Guess I’ve been doing AI development longer than I thought.