Who would have known? Asking AI things was never a real job?!

  • mPony
    link
    fedilink
    422 days ago

    The audacity of using the word “engineer” is galling enough.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 day ago

    Maybe not just prompt engineer, but that skill will be required among other to effectively utilize many AI tools since the low-code/no-code capabilities are not quite there yet.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      182 days ago

      It does a pretty poor job explaining itself, at all. Ironically, it probably would have behooved the author to have used an AI to proofread this.

      The hype did not magic the jobs into existence. Because this was all part of marketing chatbots to the enterprise. They wanted companies to believe in the magic of chatbots.

      This is a full paragraph from the article. What the fuck is this trying to say? Who is “they”? Literally no questions were answered by this article.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        maybe “they” refers to those who have most to gain from all the ai bullshit. So likely executives in chatgpt for example. If the writers named something directly it could leave them open for lawsuit if things go badly

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          02 days ago

          If the writers named something directly it could leave them open for lawsuit if things go badly

          So far, I don’t think the author is capable of writing something coherent enough to be considered libel.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 days ago

    There are already tools and other AI to write the prompt for you. The prompt engineer is automated out of their job.