• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1629 days ago

    Its funny since i can just rename it to a jpeg alot of the time and it loads on irfanview.

  • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1229 days ago

    One of my smaller incentives for getting the family group chat off Messenger and onto Signal was to be able to share memes from Hexbear without converting them.

  • dblsaiko
    link
    fedilink
    1029 days ago

    Decoder skill issue. If ImageMagick or whatever other open-source software can read it, everyone else has no excuse.

    (That said, if I could pick, I’d pick JPEG XL)

  • isame [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    929 days ago

    I was just complaining to a friend that I think it’s fucking absurd that Messenger still doesn’t work with webp but I now have an ‘imagine’ button for making stupid ‘AI’ art.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Some sites still don’t support PNG lol. Usually it’s places where they specifically expect a photo, where they’ll hard code the validation to only check if it’s a JPEG. I once had to upload a picture of my face for something and the original JPEG was too large, so I took a screenshot and tried uploading that but it wouldn’t work because it only accepted JPEGs. So I had to figure out how to compress the image locally on my phone because I didn’t want to upload a picture of me to one of those online converters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        228 days ago

        Yeah that’s true. I’m mostly talking local tools right now, but low tier sites are always gonna be a problem.

      • konalt
        link
        fedilink
        228 days ago

        The only program I’ve seen that explicitly doesn’t support PNG is old Source games with custom spray images.

  • Gianni R
    link
    fedilink
    English
    629 days ago

    Hilariously, WebP often isn’t better than JPEG for compression efficiency

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    428 days ago

    Every time I try to use webp the file is bigger than in jpg, why do people try to push it for the web ? Is it maybe faster to render for browsers ?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      328 days ago

      What compression settings are you using for each? If you’re just accepting defaults it’s quite possible you’re comparing against a lossless webp, which is quite likely to be larger than jpeg at typical quality settings.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        I just did a test with the first png I found and it looks like the default were lossless, hence why compression ratio were bad. Here the webp in smaller than the jpeg and noticeably better. Maybe it would be different for different kinds of picture, with colours, more details and stuff, but here it is clear.

        For now I stand corrected, webp is better.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          228 days ago

          It may not be easy to see because the screenshot isn’t perfect, and lemmy compress it further, but the jpg clearly has some artifacts while the webp is slightly blurry.