• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    467 days ago

    Peak French stupidity, this isn’t about protecting kids - it’s about building surveillance infrastructure. Back in 2024, critics already called this the foundation for a “Great Firewall of France”. Once you have the legal framework to block websites and force ISPs to implement monitoring, mission creep is inevitable.

    The technical approach is laughably naive. They’re essentially creating a centralized system that could easily become a database of citizen sexual preferences. Even with their “double anonymity,” you’re still creating digital fingerprints and metadata trails.

    Most importantly, it won’t work. Kids will just use VPNs - the same way adults are already doing. You’re not protecting anyone; you’re just pushing everyone toward circumvention tools while normalizing government control over what adults can access online.

    It’s perfectly French because it combines maximum bureaucratic complexity with zero practical benefit, all while creating new opportunities for state overreach. Classic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    157 days ago

    I hate how VPN access is the scaffolding holding the building up making things look normal. You can visit all your normal web sites, you can bypass georestrictions, you can be a little less tracked than you might otherwise be. But what happens when they decide to do away with that scaffolding and we all find out they tore down the house behind it while we were enjoying “normalcy”. Too much of making the web functional depends on vpns and adblocking. We shouldn’t have to do this stuff and Chromes adblocking scandle should impact millions of users all around the world unilaterally removing adblocking from the web. I fear for the day we have a US only internet and a global internet, not just on paper, but in actual practice.

  • bthest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Don’t people realize there are hundreds of free porn video sites besides Pornhub? With bigger selection too because the lesser known sites usually don’t get half their content DMCAed.

    Paying money for a VPN just to access ONE free porn site? Sigh. I really hate web 3.0

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 days ago

    I guess this bodes well for Proton becoming increasingly a Google One products replacement with more users potentially paying

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46 days ago

    I’m pretty satisfied as a subscriber. Slowly using proton mail for more and more important accounts. Constant usage of the VPN. Trying to use the calendar more but still haven’t broken my Google Calendar habits. Proton Drive I use over google; I just need a Linux desktop application. Proton pass, still haven’t given that a go. Comfortable with KeepassXC and managing the backups myself. Proton Docs, it’s OK. Solid start. Hoping that notes partnership/acquisition eventually replaces Google Keep for me as a cloud notes application. I have pretty strong confidence now in the company regardless of the slow Linux developments

  • Spaniard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 days ago

    And now they want to keep doing the job of the parents and forbid “social network” to kids 15 and under.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4148 days ago

    Dr. Cox was right: “I’m fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there’d only be one website left, and it’d be called ‘Bring Back the Porn.'”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1788 days ago

      Political theater. “Won’t somebody think of the children?” is an easy win for politicians.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          478 days ago

          Yeah the point is just to soften the populace to the idea. Our fucking PM covered for pedophile priests in a Catholic school 30 years ago, he doesn’t give any fuck about kids.

        • RiQuY
          link
          fedilink
          English
          788 days ago

          If you are paying for a VPN and you have buffering problems, change to another VPN, that one is shit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              48 days ago

              Sometimes routing between two IPs is fucked. Had that, and proxying to another location then to the destination again fixed it. Internet 😵

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          148 days ago

          Video over Tor is pretty awful, simply due to the way Tor works; Bandwidth is inherently limited, because it’s shared by everyone using the network. Same reason you should avoid torrenting over Tor.

          But if your video is buffering over a VPN, you need to find a new VPN provider. Mine maxes out my gigabit connection.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 days ago

            Are there going to be bandwidth problems with vpns when more countries block porn though?

            Like lots of France just joined them, and the rest of us lost a bunch of French exit nodes (at least for porn). The increase in subscribers should help expand bandwidth at big servers, but there’sa limit when we’re talking whole nations.

        • AmbitiousProcess
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 days ago

          My VPN’s perfectly fine. To be fair, it’s not a free plan of a VPN that’s heavily throttled, but I can even play multiplayer FPS games with only a few milliseconds of additional delay, and my overall max upload and download speed is almost exactly identical to when I have my VPN off.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 days ago

          Why use Tor? It’s been compromised for years now. Just use I2P. You can torrent with that too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      848 days ago

      It’s not about blocking porn.

      It’s always about control. Conservatives want to control how you consume sexual content.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 days ago

      VPN companies and data brokers have a financial incentive to lobby for intrusive age-verification and restrictions, and prudish politicians are conveniently present in every political system. The porn lobby is powerful, but it seems they’ve been losing this battle recently. Or maybe they’re cutting deals with the data brokers, who knows.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 days ago

      Politically speaking, it’s easy money. You pander to the conservatives with blocking propositions, get votes.

      *Who is going to champion the flip side?!"

      • Liz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        158 days ago

        Me. Porn is fine. Teach your children how to handle it. Teach them that it’s not realistic and some of it is straight-up dangerous. Put a filter on your internet if you’re too scared to talk to your kids about uncomfortable topics.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 days ago

          Man it’s porn, not guns. Children should not be near it!

          Oh wait this is France

          Anyway, I agree with you. We’re talking about regular ol garden variety porn. Everyone will probably see it at some point. Parents can limit what their kids see until the kids become smart enough to bypass filters. At which point they can probably handle seeing pennis n vagene.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        138 days ago

        Reminds me of when my buddies discovered our friend’s YouTube account… He only had one public playlist, and it was 100% full of softcore porn. Nothing else. It was all softcore porn. We gave him a pretty good ribbing for that one, and still make a point of reminding him that better porn sites exist every time it comes up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 days ago

          Always hide your playlists and subscriptions haha

          But softcore has the benefit to help you retain normal libido and to not be dependent of more hardcore stuff

        • Walk_blesseD
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 days ago

          We gave him a pretty good ribbing for that one,

          I guess you could say he got ribbed for his pleasure.

      • That Weird Vegan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 days ago

        Meanwhile in Australia, they just passed a bill requiring social media to verify the age of their users to make sure they’re over 16

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I feel like reddit and YouTube are completely different leagues when it comes to porn… Porn is the only reason I haven’t deleted my last reddit account. YT doesn’t even really have real porn…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 days ago

          YT doesn’t even really have real porn

          Indeed, but there’s still things to find if you’re a young scared kiddo, and I’d say it’s pretty soft so it’s okay

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2478 days ago

    I have to admit, of all the nations on earth, I never expected this sort of puritanical theatrical authoritarianism out of the french.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      988 days ago

      They’ve been trying to block it for many years now.

      France has been going downhill for quite some time. Many proposals for chat control and tracking… even recently, we got a law proposal that aimed at banning E2EE 😵

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          When it’s not about protecting kids, it’s about fighting drugs

          They always have a “good” reason to remove our freedom, because apparently security seems much more important, and it seems like it’s the only way to do it. Lol.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          107 days ago

          Authoritarians have embraced internet culture somehow.

          I’m curious how they got Gen Z so curtailed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 days ago

        Politicians are always trying to ban encryption in every country. I remember it happening constantly in the 90s. And it happens because politicians don’t understand that you can’t ban math

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      818 days ago

      They should actually take to the streets (again). Not joking. What is this nanny-state BS?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      40
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      To clarify, the french didn’t ban pornhub, it’s the company behind pornhub who decided to deny it’s access in France to protest a law proposal that is currently getting examined in parliament

      Ps : The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users

      • That Weird Vegan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        278 days ago

        Ps : The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users

        This is how young boys learn to computer. It won’t do shit to stop anything. It’s a waste of time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          197 days ago

          Well – this might be more succesful in boostering the IT skills of France’s next generation than any curriculum reform.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 days ago

          How do you know it’s just boys? Seems an odd assumption, considering the nature of omission of information with this.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 days ago

            Because the majority of porn watchers are male at about a 4:1 ratio. They aren’t saying it was exclusively boys either, likely just what made sense from their perspective at the time.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        177 days ago

        The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users

        Wait aren’t they proposing the same thing in the US as well? It’s a fairly standard thing of right-wing governments to just demand the impossible with no understanding about it could possibly be achieved.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          117 days ago

          They understand just how hard it would be to comply. And that’s the point. Make it hard enough to meet the requirements to not make worth a business’ while to comply. And the politicians can say “We didn’t ban PornHub. They blocked you from access.”

          It’s a common tool both the left and right use to control behaviors. Governments around the world do this all the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          87 days ago

          For now it’s not nation wide, it’s just up to states if they want to implement an age verification law like that. They want to make it so that in order to prove your identity/age you need to do something like upload a copy of your ID/Drivers License that will be linked with your “research” accounts.

          They say it’s to “save the children” and shit like that but the end goal really is to basically shame people who enjoy researching things because Jesus says it’s bad.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -117 days ago

          Right, because we’ve never checked ID for things like tobacco and alcohol before?

          These porn companies should work on efficient cost effective ways to verify adults instead of using politics and social media to increase profits. I’m sure you are aware profit is higher if children are allowed on their websites.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Yes because I’m not buying whisky online am I’m going to a physical store where I can give them my physical ID and they can look at my physical face. Unless I’m wearing a very convincing prosthetic there isn’t very much I can do to hide my identity.

            Online is harder, just because I have uploaded an ID doesn’t mean it’s mine. What are they going to do, demand a video as well, because it’s not as if video generation hasn’t already gotten to the point where it’s perfectly capable of faking that kind of thing.

            I can see you haven’t thought about this at all. You should run for office.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            227 days ago

            It’s very different handing my ID to a store clerk, who barely looks at it because my birth year starts with 19, from uploading a photo of that ID to a sketchy service who now has a permanent documentation of precisely who I am and what sort of freaky shit I’m into.

            Sure, the tracking services already know this, but they don’t also have a photo of my ID that I willingly gave to them to prove it’s me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -37 days ago

              Are you embarrassed you look at porn? There’s plenty of ways to manage without an internet connection. Go grab a compilation torrent.

              Even if all these sites went verification tonight, you’d still be able to privately jerk off to whatever it is you want to hide so bad.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 days ago

                  Given that I torrent without a VPN and it had nothing on there, and it also got my location wrong by over 500km, I dont think I’m too worried.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -17 days ago

                  I’m not opposed to vpns. I simply don’t want porn accessible to children easily. Simple barriers to entry like an ID or credit card have worked before and surely will again once porn streaming sites give up fighting this regulation and start working to follow it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            47 days ago

            How about we put some responsibility on parents to keep their kids away from potentially harmful Internet content, instead of relying on the state to do it for us in large swathes, affecting literally anyone who goes to those sites, legally or not? Surely you’re more on board with responsible parenting than everyone having to hand over their legal identification to a fucking porn site.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -27 days ago

              Its on both sides of the relationship, parent and porn provider. Same as with alcohol and tobacco, if you don’t have parents doing their part, those kids end up with that stuff anyways.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                47 days ago

                Brick and mortar shops aren’t comparable to websites, and I don’t know why you keep trying to compare them. The places that sell alcohol and tobacco aren’t asking me to upload a digital version of my legal identification to some cloud-backed database. They’re just manually checking a date and a picture. Most places I buy from don’t even make me physically hand over my ID, I can just show it to them without it ever leaving my possession.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -27 days ago

                  You’ve never had your I’d scanned at a store before? How do you think all that works?

      • ssillyssadass
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 days ago

        The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users

        Isn’t that already the case on a lot of the internet?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          147 days ago

          I think this law requires you to upload a photo of your ID and says that it’s the website’s fault if underage people use it and they face a hefty fine. It’s a lot more than the standard “click to pinky promise that you’re definitely 18” because PornHub already has that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I know right? Aren’t there nude beaches in the south of France where people will fuck in broad daylight with others watching?

      French citizens please confirm (for uh, science, and not vacation planning)!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        348 days ago

        Yes, there are. But you misunderstood the news: France didn’t block pornhub, pornhub blocked France as a protest against a new law.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          107 days ago

          Age verification in a porn database is odd to me, from a privacy point of view AND a massive undertaking for the porn company. And then there’s the puritan culture of wanting to block teenagers from watching porn? Seems a very anti-French thing to me, but I’m also pretty ignorant of actual French culture. I assumed French culture would be like, once you have the urges, you’ll go seeking, and if you need to look at the internet in the safety of your own bedroom, is better than unexpected pregnancies to satisfy urges.

          What’s the deal with all of this, anyway? What are the arguments here?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            57 days ago

            I’m not aware of the exact motivations of all the actors. What follows are my guesses.

            My guess would be that

            • Some député want to protect children from the most dangerous types of porn (which I can hear on some level, porn can be addictive for some people and can lead to negative behaviour, children are always more sensitive).
            • Some probably think that all porn is bad and want to prevent anyone from consuming it, this would only be a first step for those.
            • Some definitely want to be able to spy on everyone and use this as an excuse to further reduce privacy and freedom

            You might not be aware depending where you are from, but France is on a slippery slope towards Fascism, the far right is gaining more power every day, a lot of people think it is very plausible that a far right president is elected on the next election (2027), along with a parliament’s majority.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 days ago

            What are the arguments

            “Protect delicate children’s eyes from seeing nudity”

            I think that’s about it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 days ago

            Germany had this since forever, it’s just how offline laws translate to the internet: There’s a difference between a) ordinary nudity, b) eroticism and c) straight-up porn. The latter was always 18+, in video rental stores etc. they would have a separate section and if you didn’t look of age you’d get ID’d.

            You can’t order alcohol online in Germany without a proper age check, and the same applies to porn. For paid offerings that’s no issue, payment providers offer age checks (your bank knows how old you are and them vouching suffices), for free sites it’s a no-go, noone is going to go through the hassle. Especially as you can escape off the German-language internet onto the international one and merely click through an “are you 18” banner.

            Notably, pornhub isn’t blocked in Germany – neither from the German side, nor from pornhub’s. Very occasionally DNS bans are ordered when a site without age checks tries to specifically target the German market. Mostly though it’s down to German google not serving up those international porn sites which in the end is good enough for the youth protection authorities because the point is not to make access impossible, it’s to make sure that youth not ready for content doesn’t stumble across it. And once you’re actively seeking, you’re ready, the hoops you have to jump through are proof of the “active” part. YMMV on “not ready for porn with 18”, back in the days there was still softcore. On free TV. Probably won’t hurt kids to not start out with gonzo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Democracy and general Egalitarianism is so 2008. Authoritarianism is what’s hot now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The percentages of respondents in surveys on infidelity answering “not a moral issue” from France are a bit of a cultural difference (from Australian perspective, anyway)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1058 days ago

    I’m shocked that this many people feel the need to disobey a rule that is only there to help the children. Next step must be to ban VPNs altogether, and enforcing all Internet users to be identified with their real identity (/s obviously).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      308 days ago

      The VPNs will be harder to ban. Not just from a technical standpoint, but politically as well. Big businesses will be absolutely opposed to VPN bans.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 days ago

        There will be a lot of businesses who feel the (justified) need to hide the entrypoint to their infrastructure behind a VPN.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 days ago

        I feel they could easily ban VPN companies (maybe?), which is what 99.9% of people that want to browse from a different location use.

        This won’t affect companies at all as they would be using their own VPN.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          The only way the sovereign nation of France can ban VPN companies not based in France is to block the IP address of every single entry point of every single VPN company and keep doing so as they add new entry points (I bet the response on the VPN company side would be to start having some kind of dynamic VPN server thing).

          And then, as somebody else already pointed out, any technically inclined person can just rent a VPS anywhere in the World and fire up their own VPN server on it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 days ago

      if the VPN ban doesn’t work then the only reasonable course of action would be to ban the internet entirely. it’s the only way the children can be truly safe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      88 days ago

      Don’t give them ideas. If they block no-log VPNs I’m going to become a real threat 👀

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 days ago

      Fun fact: they already tried. In the same law where they tried to ban E2EE a few months ago. It went about as well as you’d expect.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 days ago

      Does the rule in question even apply to end users? All I had heard of it was that it put some kind of requirement on the website itself to identify people, which a person seeking out a noncompliant or foreign website presumably wouldn’t be the one violating?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    818 days ago

    How about you just parent your children? But it’s not about the children, that’s just always the convenient excuse

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      France passed a law requiring porn sites to verify age of all site visitors. Pornhub is blocking France instead of forcing its visitors to provide ID.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1008 days ago

        wow, didn’t expect that from france. I thought they, of all countries, would be less prudish than Texas about porn. 😬

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 days ago

          Texas isn’t the first. I think it was started by Germany? I know the UK banned women’s orgasms and Australia banned hentai. Heck, India apparently banned porn altogether, ineffectively.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Germany didn’t do anything like that. Britain tried to ban porn like this but realized it’s a terrible idea and stepped back from it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              68 days ago

              Ironically, it was PornHub’s parent company that was set to run the UK age verification scheme.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            88 days ago

            Australia banned hentai

            Did we? My scientific search the other night proves that false, and I’m not on VPN.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 days ago

            I know the UK banned women’s orgasms

            Why? To prevent British women from having expectations?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -28 days ago

              Because female cum is urine according to the powers that be, and that’s too much for them.

    • oppy1984
      link
      fedilink
      English
      328 days ago

      As one headline put it “PornHub pulls out of France”.