CTDummy

Personally, I’d much rather have the choice than just have whatever gets slapped together and shipped by a dev. I’m particularly grateful having recently gone to 3440x1040p, just how many game support it and the options I can tweak to get my personal sweet spot of looks vs frames.

If there’s no low, med or high options that a lot of games ship with; no shame in searching “<game> best graphics settings” or some variant. I still do for some games when I can’t be arsed or when the performance sucks due to a random post processing effect being borked and tanking performance. Games are more complex than ever and with essentially endless permutations of hardware configurations, the graphics settings tend to reflect that.

Cheers appreciate the insightful reply!

Not like the comm in drowning in traffic. Post em all I say.

I can post interiors later if you guys want. :)

Please do. I’m about to go offline for a bit but would love to ask you about your process, especially planning, etc.

I mean it’s close to doable but you’d be pushing what’s healthy in terms of weight loss. The problem with rapid weight loss is mainly yo-yo dieting. You usually use a fad/crash diet that isn’t sustainable long term and then gain it back. Lifting + some cardio is the best bang for buck in terms of calories burnt for most in terms of time/effort.

The boozing is a problem for a couple reasons (beyond the obvious reasons, but I’ll spare you the sermon there). One beer is ~112cal. Maintenance for me was -2200cal back in the day. Drinking ten beers, which back when I was boozing was enough to get a buzz going. That’s 1120cal, eating at a loss for me was 1600-1700cal if I recall. So one night’s buzz undoes 2 days dieting, at least.

If you then eat to account for it, you run the risk of getting most your calories from booze, which can be incredibly harmful for you long term, I.e. deadly I’m pretty sure.

In most countries, if you’re in a situation that needs you to shoot a gun, you generally need to have grounds to use lethal force. If you are, where you shoot doesn’t make a lot of difference. There are arteries in your leg, that if hit, does not bode well for you.

Also, if you are in a lethal force situation (e.g. someone coming at you with a weapon) you want to aim centre mass to increase your likelihood of hitting. Shooting down at that angle (towards to the leg) also means the round could ricochet and hit someone other than the target. The “just shoot them in the leg” is very much movie/gaming logic.

All situations that don’t risk imminent loss of life should be dealt with via taser where applicable though, so agreed on that.

Quick, ditch the canals.

Yeah my questions are three-fold.

1. Why is this weirdo obsessed with canals?
2. What is even the point, just because a body is retrieved from canals doesn’t mean they died in there?
3. Even if they (or some of them) died in the canal, is that outside the realm of possibility? People who can’t swim can drown in surprisingly shallow water, being pushed from even a couple of metres could stun some people leading them to drown. I.e. not outside the realm of possibility.

Like what’s the point here? Of all the convoluted of conspiracies.

Lmao already people making their agents try this on the site. Of course what could have been a somewhat interesting experiment devolves into idiots getting their bots to shill ads/prompt injections for their shitty startups almost immediately.

More concerningly is this going to trial in the US’ current governmental “degraded” (to put it lightly) condition. NFPs get a bunch of concessions and benefits to being such. It’s not unheard of for NFPs to have for profits subsidiaries but I feel like letting them bootstrap into FP, often on the taxpayers/states dime should be, legally speaking, a no no.

Nah it’s just your claim of them of addressing none of the OPs concerns and being a blind shill is objectively wrong and you’e in your feelings about that being pointed out to you.

Fuck that is depressing. I had hoped I’d be able to pay for a service and not worry about this shit to avoid the hassle of self hosting. Very informative thank you.

Op.

can create a priority inbox without all the pesky notification clutter

User.

(e.g. you can create aliases for your shipping stuff called [website].shipping@[myalias].com and then make a rule including all the adresses .shipping to a specific folder).

I.e avoiding shipping notification clutter by directing to folders. Don’t really disagree with the placing too much trust in one company for whatever it’s worth.

Thanks for the links, the recovery email aspect was covered in the initial comment old mate was replying to. I was more interested in if the hand your ass over remark had anything to do with the “they cant read your emails”/encryption part. The second link is very interesting though:

After providing the activist’s metadata to Swiss authorities, ProtonMail removed the section that had promised no IP logs, replacing it with one saying, “ProtonMail is an email that respects privacy and puts people (not advertisers) first.”

Also, sealioning is “just asking questions” (JAQ’ing off). Consistently interrogating a position or POV for example, with requests for evidence. Not asking someone to provide some sort of evidence for a single claim they made in reply to another user and refusal to find said evidence for them.

Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning ) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter

Emphasis mine. From wiki. I appreciate the attempt to deescalate though and accept it’s probably time to pack it in with that particular user.

How about you google burden of proof? Like the other user said burden of proof is on the party making the claim. It’s not on other people to prove the claim wrong by doing research for you.

Sure I saw yours and accept that, but “hand your ass over” doesn’t equate to “complies minimally with legal request they have to in order to remain functioning as a business” in my book.

Burden of proof is on you.

Are you basing this on anything? I agree with another poster that proton being the go to alternative is somewhat suspect in my paranoid brain but some of these remark here seem pretty outlandish.

They addressed all the OPs requirement excluding remarking on the spam filter. What are you even talking about.