• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月29日

help-circle





  • FreeAZ@sopuli.xyztoMemes@lemmy.mlDemocratic Socialists
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    11 个月前

    Yes, under a dictatorship, it’s literally happened before. Are you being serious or is this supposed to be some sort of gotcha where you go “socialism can’t exist without democracy so the label is pedantic”?

    Socialism under one party governments have happened, that is not democracy, even if democratic elements exist within. You can’t have democracy under one party, the people need the ability to form an opposition party if the need arises.


  • FreeAZ@sopuli.xyztoMemes@lemmy.mlDemocratic Socialists
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    11 个月前

    Democratic socialism just means you believe in democratically governed socialism, not that you think you can just vote capitalism into socialism. There’s both reformist and revolutionary democratic socialists. I both believe in democracy and also see that the only way to overturn capitalism (at least in the US) would be through revolution. All the democratic part means is that they’re opposed to monarchies or dictatorships.



  • Exactly, the goal is to make it so everyone has that much accumulated wealth by the time they retire. We have enough so that everyone can live somewhat comfortably. People who critize socialists like Hasan for being rich are dumb. Being a socialist doesn’t mean you can’t be successful, it means you want everyone to have that level of comfort and security. If they were billionaires they might have a point, but I won’t say someone’s a hypocrite for being a socialist with a few million in the bank.

    It’s also why I laugh when Conservatives talk about “The Hollywood Liberal Elite”. The real ruling class are the giant corporate executives and old money. Most actors are closer to working class than that. I also think public figures like actors, musicians, athletes, etc. should be paid a bit more than the average person, being under constant public scrutiny genuinely is stressful. The gap between them and us just needs to be closed a bit with the actual ruling class’ money.




  • I prefer toggle crouch and I still much prefer it on the right stick. Allows you to spam crouch and aim at the same time, but do you. I just think it’s objectively better and hate when any action I would use while controlling the camera is on a face button.

    My main point is there is a genuine reason it’s mapped to the stick by default, I would be annoyed if it was on the face buttons by default.


  • FreeAZ@sopuli.xyztoGaming@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    No…

    The entire reason it’s like that is so you can crouch and aim at the same time, it’s almost objectively better, as long as you don’t accidently press it.

    The best control schemes are the ones that bind any action that would be useful to do while still controlling the camera to the back buttons or the sticks.