1·
2 days agoDepends on the type of IMAX and movie. For a movie like this, the full dome isn’t as good as the imax 70.
TryingSomethingNew
Nerd of many hats.
- 0 Posts
- 149 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 11th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Fewer than that. The San Antonio IMAX has had issues and since they no longer make them, may be out of commission forever.
Clarification: they had a 70mm film projector.
3·3 days ago“For this story, Fortune’s journalists used generative AI as a research tool.
INT vs WIS, for the nerds.
Or ghost.org
Don’t take any medicine whatsoever and die young. You can do it. We’ll carry on. Somehow.
Pretty sure they’ll be fine.
“Mozilla CEO earned $6,903,089 in 2022” https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5053290/mozilla-2023-annual-report-ceo-pay-skyrockets-while-firefox-marketshare-nosedives
JWZ has also had some choice words:
Also: https://www.jwz.org/blog/2026/01/kitten-meat-deli-slices/ (explicitly about Mozilla stuff) And
Several Doctors have had that happen. Colin Baker played Cmdr Maxil on Arc of Infinity, IIRC.
YouTube. https://ofcourseitsgood.com/links
Search for Aggressive Cooking Tutorials. Her style is great, food is practical and reasonable.
https://momsdish.com/recipe/617/ukrainian-dumplings-aka-galushki
Ukrainian halushki. Its dumplings, frequently served with potatoes
You assume it’s conscious. It’s autocomplete with a bigger vocabulary.
Yes, but people are reading Lemmy and responding in this thread.
Correct, but it’s semantics. Most people just think all AI is generative these days, and so I’m trying to differentiate.
Actual AI, learning models, not large language models hallucinating things.
Don’t worry, the US is giving tech bros nuclear materials. What can go wrong. Go wrong. G-g-g-o wrongfggggggg
33·1 month ago“You’re winning too much” is definitely something Jeffries would complain about. Dipshit - you want to take back control of congress, do more than sternly worded emails and tut-tuts.
The problem is that the people in charge of the streaming services are very bad at making TV, because their business model is not the same as TVs business model. TVs business model is: sell ads. Run 24 episodes, every episode, build numbers, keep it going. There’s not much brand loyalty, there’s show loyalty.
Streamers care about one thing: getting you to subscribe. The Witcher is a great example. They got a lot of people to subscribe based on season one. Afterwards, all they might be able to use it to get other people to join, and they do, the real money isn’t getting other people to join who’ve never heard of the show, either by advertising for the Witcher, or by moving onto some other property that has a rabid fan base, adapting it, and getting them to join (see also one piece, avatar, etc.). And when they’re waiting for the next season, they find other shows, and are now subscribers for life, and who cares if the next season is 3 years away… or never comes.
38·1 month agoRight, because you wanted the experience of feeding the giraffes. That was your benefit from paying the second time. That was entirely optional.
“It wasn’t immediately clear why Gabbard was releasing the information.”
Journalists deliberately being lazy. We all know why.
As Ted Breaux showed, the wormwood percentage was overstated and the dangers were overblown.
And OP, there are stateside absinthes you could get that should be legit. Lucid and Jade apparently had Ted as their distiller these days (and if you haven’t read the articles on him, they’re definitely worth reading)