

I wish them luck with that!
I wish them luck with that!
Weirdly enough, I went to a book store one time, picked up one of his newer books, didn’t think I’d like it from the summary, but I read the first few pages and was hooked. Had to leave so I figured I would read the rest by downloading from libgen.is…
First time I’ve felt significantly disappointed not being able to read a book :'(
Its not gentrification if we build enough of it!
An alternative idea to allow a user to be apart of multiple instances simultaneously: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3416
Oh idk, maybe people actually like to use online services without interruptions? I’ve already had to recreate my lemmy account twice! (vlemmy.net and lemmy.fmhy.ml both went down)
Love GrapheneOS, don’t love the weird combative community culture, or (former) lead developer tho…
Hmmm… words used in not-satiric circumstances where the true meaning isn’t the intended meaning is a bit confusing…
Hmmm, I guess I don’t like the reasoning “extreme version of complicated idea is bad, therefore the idea is bad in general”. Like its fine to dislike an idea’s extremes, but it would be disingenuous to also dismiss its more moderate forms.
everyone is equal and thus should have equal rights and treatment under the law
Isn’t that like the definition of (clasical) liberalism?
The mechanistic reasoning might be plausible, but is there any actual examples of a modern capitalist society regressing back to some form of feudalism to any significant degree?
The point where I’d be worried is when a single company is the majority of a country’s GDP or has complete control over the government. The only examples I can think of that even get close to these possibilities are South Korea’s Chaebols or Hong Kong’s corporate voting block.
What about capitalism requires infinite growth? And what does it require infinite growth in? What happens when growth stagnates in a capitalist system? Does it suddenly not become capitalist anymore?
So you are defining an ambiguous term in order to better criticise it? That makes sense, but it might not convince people who have different definitions 🤔
Like I for example would consider a Co-Op where the employees own the company / have voting power over how its run to be a part of a capitalist system, hell, I’d even consider someone who makes a living as an artist where they own all their tools to be a part of a capitalist system… although I suppose that could also be considered socialist to some degree because the artist “owns” the means of production?
These definitions are kind of difficult to use…
Hmmm, its those kinds of extreme statements that make me a bit suspicious. Is global warming really an extinction level event? I can imagine terrible civil wars over resources and increasing displacement from natural disasters, but total eradication of the human race is afaik not a possible result of global warming.
I don’t think pure capitalism as you describe it exists, or if it does its definitely not common.
Huh, I use capitalism solely to refer to the first two 🤔
What is egalitarianism?
Does anyone else see “removed” in this comment? Is the instance editing comments to censor certain words or is it just the user?