How does this compare to copyparty?

How do you go about doing that?

Are you aware of the reason(s) for this? To discourage would be callers from following through?

You indicated you are against homogeny and pro discussion. I wonder how your proposed solution doesn’t contribute to these.

Almost like the old internet is still in there somewhere. Just gotta sort through all the shit first.

How so?

Congrats!

What capabilities?

Vscodium might be an option for you

Why 5%?

Or for expats who buy a phone in their new country and cant access their apps anymore. Even worse as more businesses require the use of their app for certain things and don’t offer a web app.

So right now, I assume, the store content is based on your apple account country not your geolocation?

It’s probably a hunter leaving bait for deer or something. Hence the orange getup.

How can a heat pump have no moving parts?l

This is an interesting idea:

The “at least one” in the prompt is deliberately aggressive, and seems likely to force hallucinations in case an article is definitely error-free. So, while the sample here (running the prompt only once against a small set of articles) would still be too small for it, it might be interesting to investigate using this prompt to produce a kind of article quality metric: If it repeatedly results only in invalid error findings (i.e. what a human reviewer  Disagrees with), that should indicate that the article is less likely to contain factual errors

I see you’ve also purchased a new scratching post

Is the project current? I see an archived repository.

I don’t mean to question the sincerity of your post when I ask this. Did you use a LLM, like chatgpt, to edit/phrase your question? This style of writing is also used by humans, so I absolutely could be wrong. I am just checking my AI detection calibration.

I think philosophers around that time often did this especially if they were using a word in a way it is not usually used.

Why is that?