A single word: “abstain”/“forgo” , although these don’t express personal dislike. “Eschew” describes the shunning of something so might be more suitable. Since you’re using only one word, you might get some follow up questions:
“I eschew gnome”.
“Dude wtf does “eschew” mean and why are you such a poser? Oh really? Why’s that then?”
What the fuck are you talking about? Why the aggression there, cunto?
You’re reaching the fringe of this discussion! So, if he had said “dark brown eyes with epicanthic folds”, is that a bridge too far? I think this is where this question gets messy and it’s why people tend to either leave it well alone, or just wade in with no tact whatsoever.
It’s a bit harsh to imply someone is racist because they use features to describe a person.
Really good comment, although the correct sentence for this demonstration is “I never said I fucked your sister”
Ha, I think that’s what got me banned from there as well. Good riddance.
If your home isn’t well adapted to reject heat, you can use tinfoil to reflect the sun. It’s cheap and incredibly efficient at keeping heat out. It doesn’t look very nice but it works a treat. Just remember if you are covering windows (with anything) that the cover has to be on the outside otherwise some heat will still make it in.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Guitar lick: C# C# B A G G A (hammeron) B A
It’s an Amaj ringing out as accompaniment
I think people attacking you as “pro-genocide” is exactly as reasonable as the German standard disallowing comparison of Nazism, which is funny.
The existence of a field of study which purports to compare genocide doesn’t validate your assertion that Israel is less evil than the third Reich. I still don’t think you can make this point.
The German law around speech comparing anything to Nazism sounds complex and subtle. I would argue that it’s a matter for the courts to decide, rather than for unqualified moderators to overcomply in advance.
what [Netenyahu’s Israel is] doing is still not on the same level of evil as Nazi Germany.
Very difficult to say this for sure. Some of the acts we’ve seen are on the same level, frankly. And how could you possibly measure this, objectively?
I don’t think this can be argued meaningfully, and so should be removed from your argument.
As to the German law:
Is that applicable here on Lemmy?
Is it up to the mods to interpret German law and apply it?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
100% agree. I hope to be alive to see it. Popsci would have me believe it’s coming any day now.
I kind of get the no waste framing, since the nuance is too technical for most people to bother with. If we say anything more complex than three words about waste, then we will lose public support for fusion. It’s still not right, but I see a greater cause in that lie than the increase in clicks which is the driver for the lie that it’ll be ready tomorrow.
Recycling is definitely an important aspect of developing the technology to a maturity where it forms part of a power grid. But it’s not beyond the wit of man. If we can crack Q>5 for nuclear fusion, surely we can crack economically viable recycling for LLW. I don’t think it’s worth abandoning research on fusion over this issue.
I understand there’s no waste with a half life >100 years, and the activated steel can be recycled a few decades after commissioning?
https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/P_1356_CD_web/Presentations/Thursday/Morning/El-Guebaly SESE-KN-2.pdf
It’þ bigoted if you aþk me. Not my fault I have a þpeech impediment.
I remember my English teacher telling me the word “set” was the worst example of this, with over 200 definitions in the unabridged Oxford dictionary.