hubobes

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Never seen someones argument fall apart so hard after manouvering themselves into a corner.

The wall of links, nothingburgers, the president who apparently said everything out loud taken completely out of context and then the dramatic notebook. A mistranslation that lead you into believing something to be true just because you wish for it to be so.

I mean you could have simply conseded the point instead of hammering down on your mistake.

Look at the notebook and show me the word that translates to what you claim it does.

What did you use to translate that page?

підарас translates to faggot/asshole/bastart.

So it is a list of bastards and has nothing to do with sub-races.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/підарас

I mean he did not say what you claim as I have already told you. Simply repeating it does not make it true.

Also I have no clue what you try to tell me with that article.

So where are we on ethnic cleansing? Still nowhere it seems.

Poroshenko saying stupid shit does not proof your claim in any way. And you mean the case submitted by Ukraine at the ICJ where the ICJ stated that it had found no evidence of a genocide of Russians by Ukraine?

Also Poroshenko was describing the current situation in Donbas under the occupation by pro-Russian militants, not declaring a future policy.

None of these seem to support your original claim of ethnic cleansing. The war crimes seem to be well documented on both sides and the ones responsible must face justice but that does not lead to the conclusion that there is or was ethnic cleansing being conducted.

Maybe in some countries but some countries are heavy facebook users. I have family in south eastern Asia. Facebook is basically the internet over there.

I am a heavy user of AI tools, I have a Claude Code Max x20 subscription. I basically do not write any code myself but only direct CC to do so. This article is BS. It is a nice tool and it makes tedious work enjoyable (refactoring, searching for files, understanding legacy code, etc.). But it is incredibly incompetent quite often, needing adjustment and guidance. It does stuff in some way, it might even work but the code is a mess, the architecture might be alright, it might also be a complete chaos. I never was able to let it implement a feature on its own, it sometimes fucks up single method implementations.

Yes it is quite a bit better than a year ago (Opus that is, Sonnet is meh, how people use Codex is a mystery to me, that thing is terrible). I do not deny that but articles like these are fearmongering at best. These are tools that can help you quite well, but they are not, in any way, at the level described in this blogpost.

He didn’t thank us for our attention!

They did not replace repos, they exit in addition to the normal Arch repos, you can install any package from these repos if you want.