• 0 Posts
  • 132 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 24th, 2025

help-circle





  • I started tinkering with ai right around the time ChatGPT rose to prominence. Locally. On my own machine.

    I’m not a doctoral level researcher but I mostly get the tech.

    I couldn’t agree more. People use ai as a blanket term and don’t understand the difference between an LLM and GAN or any of the dozens of other kinds of models.

    If it’s ai it’s bad. Just full stop. Like. The anger of people decrying the death of artistic beauty on subs that prominently feature ms paint stick figure drawings and shitty distorted images makes no sense to me. This isn’t costing anyone’s job. It’s fucking garbage content, with no agenda, and always was.

    Having autonomous LLMs posting things is problematic but have ai generated shitposts isn’t.

    There is fuck all wrong with using ai to make art to hang on your walls, or funny t shirts, or ridiculous banners, or funny pictures to share with friends. The people that decry the death of art have never bought anything in a gallery, they were fine with artists getting paid fuck all before ai. They weren’t contributing to artists’ living in any meaningful way.

    And like. The most vocal critics seem to understand the least about it. Such that they hate it because it’s made with ai just assume that someone’s made it using OpenAI because that’s the only thing their rage-addled minds can process existing.

    They say it’s theft and we should ban everything (how’s that working out for you?) instead of clamouring for fair compensation for anyone whose work is being used to train a model.

    They’ll yell: all these models are based on theft. And sure. But a) I don’t give a flying fuck about a corporation’a right to exploit an artist and profit off their work and never have. And b) will respond to the suggestion that we create new models that fairly compensate people by yelling louder and becoming irate.

    They’re not rational. There are many valid criticisms of the tech, but you can’t even talk to these people about addressing them. Because a lot of the criticisms can and should be addressed. They won’t hear it.




  • I’m not sure Google has offloaded all of their thinking to LLMs.

    Google still employs very very smart people.

    They’d just have to be morally bankrupt human refuse to be contributing actively to the profit-driven destruction of the internet and mass public surveillance like they are, so the rest of your points still stand.

    And while a lot of that intelligence may be wasted, it’s more a function of banal evil and corporate bloat than LLMs.


  • The file structure in Linux distros actually makes a lot of sense when you begin to understand the parts that don’t make sense.

    But yeah. Unless you use something like bazzite the terminal is something you’ll need to use.

    This frustrated me when i started using Linux. Then one day i had a neo moment and i was like “I know bash” it just kind of happened.

    The best part of Linux , when you get used to the idea, is that anything can be anything and everything is a file.






  • If you use ai as an additive technology rather a replacement to things then really cool, ethical oppurtinitites open up for its use.

    Rather than training a voice actor for a small handful of npcs that say the same four lines ad infinitum,pay them the same amount to License their voice, train a model, and use that for the game. Pair this with an LLM and suddenly you have pcs capable of saying all kinds of hillarious shit.

    Have the coders that always write box behaviour to write the behaviour of npcs. The give players the option to talk them into doing some weird LLM powered shit.

    Like. You can use ai to add things to games. It doesn’t have to replace people’s

    I think a part of why people hate it is that idiots are trying to use it to replace things people do.

    Where it’s best is when it does things people can’t