[email protected]
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to [email protected]English • 4 months ago

"leftists"

lemmy.ml

message-square
86
fedilink
39

"leftists"

lemmy.ml

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to [email protected]English • 4 months ago
message-square
86
fedilink
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0•
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What conclusion are you proposing that I came to? My only statement was that denying Western media in favor of Eastern media is not “leftist.” Everything else you and Dessalines have attempted to drag into this discussion is creating either a false dichotomy or a strawman, in some cases both. The options are not “either you listen to PoC or you listen to Western Media,” because not all Western Media nor people of colour agree on every position. Whatever imaginary propaganda you are creating about the State suggesting that China is torturing minorities this minute is not something I have experienced, nor referenced. We have not presented the arguments that you are trying to deconstruct.

    You are boxing with shadows, throwing fists with invisible monsters in the dark. I’m not sure if it’s our of poor reading comprehension, poor critical thinking skills, or intentional dishonesty, but there’s clearly a bias here that is useless to engage with.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4•
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The post is talking about the DPRK and China.

      instead, we should trust… The other ogliarchic and blatantly fascist empires?

      Plural.

      You’re not being sneaky by refusing to state a clear argument and hiding behind liberal platitudes. There is no empire other than the US, and opposition to it is always framed as irredeemable evil and y’all eat it up.

      Make an argument, cite your sources, or stop wasting everyone’s time with deflection.

      • davel [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6•4 months ago

        The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, insists that only the more modest position is being advanced. Upon retreating to the motte, the arguer may claim that the bailey has not been refuted (because the critic refused to attack the motte) or that the critic is unreasonable (by equating an attack on the bailey with an attack on the motte).

        • Codeviper828
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1•2 months ago

          Real. This thread is making my brain hurt

[email protected]

[email protected]

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 1.96K users / day
  • 3.99K users / week
  • 8.99K users / month
  • 22.9K users / 6 months
  • 50.3K subscribers
  • 11.2K Posts
  • 141K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop
  • @[email protected]
  • Cyclohexane
  • Arthur Besse
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org